Laserfiche WebLink
• Minutes from Special City Council Meeting March 14, 1992 <br /> 3 The meeting began at 9:00 A.M.. <br /> 4 Council Present: Clarence Ranallo, Mayor, Councilmembers Dorothy Fleming, Dick <br /> 5 Enrooth; George Wagner <br /> 6 Absent: George Marks <br /> 7 Staff Present: Tom Burt, City Manager <br /> 8 CR: ......you were leaving town this afternoon and I talked with George and about the only <br /> 9 time that George really had a chance to meet was late this afternoon and Monday <br /> 10 was out so he said to go ahead and have the meeting without him and he would talk <br /> 11 to Tom Burt Monday morning and see what we had discussed today. <br /> 12 So the two things on the agenda will be a letter to the Governor along with letters <br /> 13 to the state senator and state representative and then some ideas that each one of <br /> 14 us have that we can give to Tom between now and the Council.meeting on the 24th. <br /> 15 I know we've got a work session set for March 31st, but this is so drastic that I think <br /> 16 we need to look at taking some action at our 24th Council meeting. So, if that's OK, <br /> �7 those two items on the agenda. Has anybody got anything else they want to add to <br /> 8 the agenda or that needs to be taken care of? Then we'll go with those two items. <br /> 19 What I did as far as trying to alert as many people as I could to this meeting is that <br /> 20 I had Connie and Tom call the Bulletin, Neal directly, and call Margo Ashmore of <br /> 21 the Northeaster directly advising them of this meeting. A fax to the Focus, and it's <br /> 22 been posted as usual plus on the Kiwanis board. So far I've had one person <br /> 23 responding to the Kiwanis board. <br /> 24 Over the past 2 or 3 days, I've talked with the League of Minnesota Cities and the <br /> 25 AMM. The first alert that we had was that they were looking at cutting 8% of our <br /> 26 revenue base, cutting all cities 8.2% of their revenue base. AMM calculated that out <br /> 27 to be $127,316 for St. Anthony. In fact, the maximum of our local government aid <br /> 28 and that was only 7.5% of our revenue base. Since then that's been confirmed that <br /> 29 that is what the figure is. <br /> 30 There is some ontroversey over this 8.2%. The governor said that in order to make <br /> 31 up for the big shortfall, he's proposing that local government aid be cut by $71.6 <br /> 32 million for this year's cities budgets. The cuts are limited to city aid other than <br /> 33 HACA. Since then, someone alerted him to the fact that not all cities had local <br /> 34 government aid. So now they're saying, "Wait a minute, if all cities don't have local <br /> 35 government aid, we still want 8.2% of their tax revenue base so we better look at <br /> 6 HACA." There is a possibility that we could lose some more money. <br />