My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07141992
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1992
>
CC PACKET 07141992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:17:17 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:17:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 07141992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 REGULA= COUNCIL MEETING • <br /> 2 JUNE 2 , 1992 <br /> 3 PAGE 8 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 requires this then parking places should be supplied by <br /> 7 the City . <br /> 8 <br /> 9 LeRoy Heuer , 4016 Silver Lake Road , is self-employed and <br /> 10 parks his full -size commercial vehicle on his property <br /> 11 daily . He feels the ordinance is discriminatory . <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Jeff Kennedy , 2800 Hilldale Avenue , owns a tent trailer <br /> 14 and would find it difficult to store it in his garage <br /> i5 which is already crowded . <br /> 16 <br /> 17 The City Manager noted that a variance can be granted for <br /> 18 anything in a zoning ordinance . He explained that a <br /> 19 hardship would support a variance and a hardship could be <br /> 20 a physical limitation . The fee for a variance is $60 . 00 . <br /> 21 <br /> 22 The Mayor advised that the ordinance was drafted by staff <br /> 23 at the request of the City Council as a result of <br /> 24 discussions at the Council ' s goalsetting session . The <br /> 25 City Attorney advised the Council that there can be no <br /> 26 discrimination between commercial and recreational <br /> 27 vehicles . • <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Councilmember Marks advised he has received many calls <br /> 30 regarding this proposed ordinance and none of the callers <br /> 31 favored its passage . Some of the callers felt this would <br /> 32 bean intrusion on their way of life . He had concern with <br /> 33 the enforceability of the ordinance and noted it may be <br /> 34 an unnecessary and unwise use of the Police Department <br /> 35 and Public Works Department ' time . Councilmember Marks <br /> 36 noted that what is being labelled as a problem may not <br /> 37 really be a problem. He feels the situations regarding <br /> 38 commercial vehicles may be the problems . <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Motion by Marks to cease further consideration of this <br /> 41 ordinance change . <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Mayor Ranallo stated he could not support this motion and <br /> 44 recalled that many residents had indicated they felt this <br /> 45 ordinance was being forced by the Council . He suggested <br /> 46 another meeting be held to discuss the matter of <br /> 47 commercial vehicles specifically . <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Councilmember Fleming felt the issue of vehicles which <br /> 50 are not well maintained should be considered . <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Ron Sonmore identified these vehicles as "attractive • <br /> 53 nuisances" and felt an ordinance could be drafted which <br /> 54 would address this issue. The Mayor stated it would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.