Laserfiche WebLink
Members of the City Council <br /> City of St. Anthony, Minnesota <br /> Tax Collections - Abatements <br /> The percentage of current tax collections compared to the certified tax levy was <br /> 93.65% for the year ended December 31 , 1993, compared to 96.85% for 1992. Abatements <br /> of approximately $27,250, or 1 .61% of the levy for 1993, were awarded which reduced <br /> the amount available to be collected by the City. In addition, $48,000 of prior <br /> year tax collections were refunded due to abatements in 1993 (interest of $6,732 <br /> was paid related to these refunds). These tax adjustments totaled $82,000 and <br /> combined with the decrease in percentage of current taxes collected contributed <br /> to the unfavorable variance of $146,785 for general property taxes reported in the <br /> General Fund. <br /> It is my understanding, a special levy may be certified to recover the tax revenue <br /> lost from tax abatements. However, other factors need to be consider by the Council <br /> before determining whether this special levy is necessary. <br /> One recommendation would be that when budgeting in future years, City staff consider <br /> reducing the certified levy to recognize a portion of the certified tax levy will <br /> not be collected in the current year. Delinquent tax collections are typically not <br /> significant enough to account for the deficit in current tax collections. <br /> Utility Billi S stem ng y <br /> As previously noted, the present utility billing system appears to becoming ineffi- <br /> cient to properly service the City's requirements. The capacity of the system to <br /> efficiently handle billing procedures appears to have reached its limit with the <br /> variety of additional charges required by the City. Because of the lack of capital <br /> equipment funding, no significant changes were implemented during the year. Based <br /> upon discussions with management, funding will be available to upgrade the current <br /> utility software system in 1995. The recommendations listed below are repeated from <br /> last year's letter to the City Council and should be considered during the upgrade <br /> process. <br /> Potential recommendations to be considered are: <br /> 1. A manually prepared worksheet could be developed to account for adjust- <br /> ments or changes to utility accounts. This would help insure that all <br /> adjustments are being properly recorded in the financial records. This <br /> worksheet could be expanded to include current charges and payments to <br /> provide a method of reconciling=--the_-receivables reported on the utility <br /> system to the general ledger. This would assure that all charges, pay- <br /> ments and adjustments are being properly accounted for and recorded in <br /> the accounting records. <br /> 2. Investigate the compatibility of the utility billing package offered by <br /> the company providing the current financial accounting package. The cur- <br /> rent utility system was acqui.red in 1988 to bring utility billing proce- <br /> dures in-house, rather than being performed by a service bureau. Now <br /> that the City's accounting procedures are performed in-house, perhaps <br /> the utility system should be bought on-line with the financial package. <br /> 3. Inquire of the company servicing the current utility system with regard <br /> to system updates which would enhance the system. In addition, provide <br /> the necessary training of personnel performing the -utility billing and <br /> related functions. <br />