My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 09131994
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1994
>
CC PACKET 09131994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:22:09 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:21:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
22
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1994-1998
SP Name
CC PACKET 09131994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R"ems <br /> DD 7 L�J <br /> 3490 Lexington Avenue North <br /> League of Minnesota Cities St. Paul, MN 55126-8044 <br /> July 26, 1994 <br /> Mr. Mike Mornson <br /> City Manager <br /> 3301 Silver Lake Road <br /> St. Anthony, MN 55418 <br /> Dear Mike: <br /> You asked whether the city may pay city employees who take military leave only the <br /> difference between their military pay and city pay. The answer is no. The city must pay the <br /> employee the normal city wages and benefits they would be entitled to similar to how the city <br /> • handles vacation time. <br /> For example, if you had three or four weeks of vacation coming and decided to take a <br /> temporary job with another employer, the city would not reasonably seek to offset your <br /> "vacation" wages by the amount you earn in your temporary position. <br /> The city (and every other public employer) which is covered under M.S. 192.26 must grant <br /> the military leave "without loss of pay . . . or other benefits." The Attorney General has <br /> issued opinions on this matter on several occasions and the Minnesota Court of Appeals has <br /> only very recently given a very broad interpretation to the law in Howe v. City of St. Cloud. <br /> I have included a copy of this opinion to illustrate just how liberally the statute is construed. <br /> The case also is important in that it clearly hold that policies, and/or collective bargaining <br /> agreements, that in any way reduces the normal city pay for employees on military leave are <br /> invalid because it conflicts with the leave statute. We filed an amicus brief in this case, and <br /> if you would find it useful I can send you additional information. <br /> I should also.mention that, in my opinion, many public employers have not been complying <br /> with the law and that the risk of a lawsuit depends on the relationship between the public <br /> employer and its employees. However, if a lawsuit is filed, the noncomplying public <br /> employer will lose, and could be subject to more than just an award for back pay as ordered <br /> by the court in Howe. <br /> • <br /> AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br /> (612)490-5600 1-800-925-1122 plus your city code TDD(612)490-9038 Fax(612)490-0072 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.