My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02231999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1999
>
CC PACKET 02231999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:06:47 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:06:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 02231999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> February 9, 1999 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1 Ranallo stated the City does not seize private property but purchases it on a willing seller/willing <br /> 2 buyer basis. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 June Stuhr, 3403 Maplewood Drive,presented a letter prepared by herself and her husband, Jim <br /> 5 Stuhr. "We have been residents of St. Anthony Village for 10 years. We are currently employed <br /> 6 as full-time real estate agents with RE/MAX Real Estate Guide, specializing in residential real <br /> 7 estate. Jim has been in the business for 26 years, and June for 17 years. We are both familiar <br /> 8 with real estate values in St. Anthony and the northern suburbs. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 The block bounded by Harding Street, Silver Lake Road, and 30th and 31st Avenues is unique. <br /> 11 Anyone who has seen the spacious back yards which adjoin one another to form a park-like <br /> 12 setting has to be amazed. It's undoubtedly the most beautiful residential land in the entire <br /> 13 Village. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 It is our professional opinion that if the beautiful back yards are replaced by a big, ugly hole in <br /> 16 the ground which would closely resemble an open mine pit,the properties adjoining it would <br /> 17 lose approximately 20-30%of their current market value. Depending upon how extensive an <br /> excavation would occur, some properties could be devalued by as much as 40% or more of their <br /> current market value. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Buyers will pay a premium for space, privacy and trees. Buyers will not pay for big ugly holes <br /> 22 in the ground. You don't see other municipalities digging holes in the middle of already- <br /> 23 developed residential blocks to solve drainage problems. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Real estate agents don't just deal with the financial aspects of buying and selling. We deal with <br /> 26 people's feelings. Therefore we can almost guarantee that a secondary result of digging a big, <br /> 27 ugly hole in the middle of that block would be that the current owners of the lots would <br /> 28 experience such a profound sense of sadness over the loss of something so beautiful that they <br /> 29 treasure that most of them would no longer want to live in their homes, and those would could <br /> 30 afford to sell would sell them rather than having to lookout their windows every day and be <br /> 31 - constantly reminded of their loss. It kind of takes the heart out of people. <br />- 32 <br /> 33 There's one more issue that we need to address. The highest and best use of low-priced property <br /> 34 adjoining an ugly pit would be rental use. It's just a given. It's reasonable to expect that a good <br /> 35 number of the block's homes would turn into rentals with the accompanying absentee-landlord <br /> 36 problems and diminishing property values/tax base that other municipalities have had-to face. <br /> 37 Everyone in that neighborhood would be impacted. Right now we don't want to elaborate on <br /> 38 this point too much although, as residents of this Village ourselves, our concerns about this <br /> outcome are very real." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.