Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 12 <br /> September 18, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • <br /> 1 Vice Chair Stille asked if it would affect the parking for the Medical Center. Mr. Lutz stated it <br /> 2 would reduce the parking a small amount, but would still be within compliance. <br /> .3 Commissioner Hatch stated that, according to the moratorium ordinance, it needed to be a <br /> 4 change in use. Chair Melsha stated it was arguable that it was a change in use. Vice Chair <br /> 5 Stille added that staff acknowledged that same point, and recommended approval. <br /> 6 Motion by Chair Melsha, second by Commissioner Hatch, to recommend approval of the <br /> 7 request for Lot Split: Wirth Companies, Lot 1, Block 1, Beutz Addition, contingent upon the <br /> 8 moratorium being lifted, and evidence of title being provided for the preliminary plat. <br /> 9 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 10 IX. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION. <br /> 11 9.1 Draft Antenna ordinance Review. <br /> 12 Susan Henry indicated that Chris Smith, an attorney assisting Jerry Gilligan, was present to <br /> 13 present his draft of the Antenna Ordinance for review by the Planning Commission. <br /> 14 Commissioner Tillman asked where in the draft it was listed that a conditional use permit(CUP) <br /> 15 was required outside of the Telecommunications Overlay District(TOD). Chair Melsha <br /> 16 echoed Commissioner Tillman's concern. <br /> 17 Mr. Smith indicated that the City wanted to have a TOD_where antennas would be a permitted <br /> 18 use within certain areas, with specific criteria requirements, and would be approved by City <br /> 19 Staff. He added that anything else would require a CUP and approval by the Planning <br /> 20 Commission and City Council. <br /> 21 Mr. Smith referred to Section 4 of the ordinance, which deals with the TOD. He stated that the <br /> 22 intent was that anything that did not fall within the listed provisions of Section 3 would require a <br /> 23 CUP. <br /> 24 Chair Melsha stated that Mr. Smith's interpretation was accurate. He added that there was <br /> 25 confusion because a specific TOD was not identified in the draft. <br /> 26 Mr. Smith indicated that he thought it most beneficial to describe the parcels and properties <br /> 27 which would be the overlay district, rather than an actual zoning district. <br /> 28 Chair Melsha stated that they wanted to exclude commercial properties from the ordinance. <br /> • 29 Commissioner Thomas suggested that some members of the subcommittee meet with Mr. Smith <br /> 30 to clarify some of the details. <br />