My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10092001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2001
>
CC PACKET 10092001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:53:57 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 10092001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 14 <br /> September 18, 2001 <br /> Page 5 <br /> • <br /> 1 Thomas indicated that the subcommittee discussed stating, under the purpose of the Point-Of- <br /> 2 Sale Ordinance, that the City wants to upgrade it's housing stock and is willing to work with <br /> 3 residents and home-buyers to help facilitate that upgrading. <br /> 4 Commissioner Hanson indicated that the subcommittee hoped that an In-House Inspector <br /> 5 would be part of the overall Point-Of-Sale plan. Ms. Henry indicated that would not happen <br /> 6 for three to five years, due to budget constraints. <br /> 7 Commissioner Steeves indicated that the City of Minneapolis requires applicants to post a <br /> 8 Performance Bond that is equal to 125% of the estimated cost of making the improvement so <br /> 9 that they are assured that the item is taken care of. <br /> to The Commission discussed a few examples that they have dealt with in the past in relation to <br /> t t Commissioner Steeves' statement. <br /> 12 Commissioner Tillman asked if someone who got an inspection, then decided not to sell their <br /> 13 home would still be held responsible to correct the code violations. Commissioner Hanson <br /> 14 stated that was something that has been discussed because of the potential safety and health <br /> t 5 hazards which may exist. <br /> • <br /> 16 Commissioner Thomas stated that they would give either the seller, or buyer the option to <br /> 17 correct the violations. <br /> 18 Commissioner Tillman referred to the small, non-safety issues that are identified by the <br /> 19 inspector, and asked, if the home-owner decided not to sell, would they still be held responsible <br /> 20 for correcting the violations. She added that it was a risk of requesting an inspection. <br /> 21 Commissioner Hanson stated that it could be negotiated in the contract that the buyers would <br /> 22 have ninety days to correct the violations. <br /> 23 Commissioner Thomas stated that his understanding was that a home-owner who was looking <br /> 24 to sell would need to be made aware of the Point-Of-Sale Ordinance by their realtor. He <br /> 25 added that, at that point, the home-owner could decide that they did not want to sell. He <br /> 26 added that the inspection would need to be presented at, or before, the time of closing. <br /> 27 Commissioner Thomas stated that he did not hire an inspector when they bought their home <br /> 28 three years ago, and he just discovered that his garage door opener had a red tag on it and was <br /> 29 out of compliance. He added that he felt it was something that he should have known about. <br /> 30 Ms. Henry stressed that the focus of the inspection was for Point-Of-Sale purposes. <br /> 031 The Commission requested more information on how other cities kept track of the Point-Of- <br /> 32 Sale Ordinance and associated inspections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.