My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 01242002
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2002
>
CC PACKET 01242002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:55:12 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:55:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 01242002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Village of Saint Anthony <br /> Executive Summary <br /> January, 2002 <br /> apparent "lack of community problems." Negative evaluations stemmed from specific issue <br /> disagreements. <br /> The Village Staff received a job approval rating of forty-six percent and a disapproval rating of <br /> only seven percent. Both the approval and disapproval ratings were at the Metropolitan Area <br /> suburban norm. "Helpfulness" and "good job" were two major reasons for high evaluations. <br /> The twenty-six percent of the residents reporting first-hand contact with the staff was about four <br /> percent lower than in comparable suburban areas. The City Staff, then, serve a large percentage <br /> of the population and, even more importantly, serve it very well. <br /> Recreational Facilities and Opportunities: <br /> A moderately high sixty-five percent rated the park and recreational facilities in Saint Anthony <br /> as "excellent" or"good," while fourteen percent rated them lower. Similarly, fifty-five percent <br /> felt either"very well informed" or"somewhat well informed" about the Saint Anthony Park <br /> System and Facilities. During the past year, forty-seven percent of the sample reported <br /> household members had used the Saint Anthony Community Center; eighty percent of the users <br /> rated the facility and programs as "excellent"or"good,"while twenty percent were more critical <br /> in their judgments. Forty-eight percent were unable to rate the sufficiency of youth programs <br /> offered in the community; however, forty-two percent deemed them sufficient and only nine <br /> percent saw them as lacking in some way. <br /> Facilities Needs: <br /> By a 54%-21% margin, residents supported a property tax increase for a replacement Fire <br /> Station 4, which would house equipment, training facilities, and emergency medical services. <br /> And, by a 46%-23%judgment, they also supported a property tax increase for a replacement <br /> Public Works building to serve as a garage and repair area for heavy city equipment. The typical <br /> resident would support a property tax increase of$26.60 annually to fund a new facilities <br /> program for the Village of Saint Anthony. But, while twenty percent would oppose any tax <br /> increase for this purpose, twenty-one percent would support twice this level. <br /> Municipal Liquor Stores and Stonehouse Bar and Grill: <br /> Sixty-six percent of the residents reported visiting one of the Municipal Liquor Stores during the <br /> past twelve months. Over eighty percent rated the store and staff positively on a series of <br /> customer service dimensions: courtesy of the staff, assistance provided by the staff, knowledge <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.