My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 11122002
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2002
>
CC PACKET 11122002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:59:20 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:59:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 11122002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 6 <br /> October 22, 2002 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 1 Transfer constructed the first building on this site in 1959. He stated Berger Transfer is <br /> 2 over 90 years old, was established in 1910, and has become the largest Allied Transport <br /> 3 company in the United States. He reviewed their contribution to City events on a regular <br /> 4 basis, to parades, festivals, the fire department, and engineering department by providing <br /> 5 storage space at no charge. He stated Berger Transfer was named Business of the Year <br /> 6 for the City of St. Anthony several years ago. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Mr. Murlowski stated he has been working with Berger Transfer for over 25 years and <br /> 9 before that his father did. He stated that he is proud to be associated with Berger Transfer <br /> 10 and that this project requests no City assistance or TIF. It will be privately funded and is <br /> 11 a large job. He stated that each year Belair Excavating is involved with only 10 to 15 <br /> 12 projects larger than this throughout the United States. He noted that within the current <br /> 13 economy, they are thankful to have Berger Transfer as a customer. He stated he <br /> 14 appreciates the question of the audience member about public assistance and assured <br /> 15 everyone that the project will be privately funded and nothing will be asked except for the <br /> 16 two variances. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Mr. Murlowski stated they are asking for relief from Code requirements they feel are <br /> 19 restrictive based on restriction that the land provides. He stated they are disappointed that <br /> 20 things did not go their way with the Planning Commission and will try to do a better job <br /> 21 tonight to explain reasonable use. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Mr. Murlowski stated the evidence discussed previously was proven, besides the <br /> 24 reasonable use item, and they are prepared to address that issue tonight. He stated the <br /> 25 most important thing he can talk about is that in today's business climate, businesses <br /> 26 cannot operate on the status quo because the world changed in 2000 and 2001 and <br /> 27 business intelligence needs to rise above that level. He stated if this is not built as a high- <br /> 28 pile storage business, he will guarantee the building will not be constructed and Berger <br /> 29 Transfer will remain unable to attract new customers or maintain the existing customer <br /> 30 base without this type of new construction. He stated a good example of the proposed <br /> 31 building is at 200 Old Highway 8 in New Brighton which was built about two years ago <br /> 32 as an addition to an older lower ceiling height building. He stated the New Brighton <br /> 33 building is 56,000 square feet and this proposed building would be 40,000 square feet. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Mr. Murlowski presented colored pictures of the New Brighton building, noting the <br /> 36 pleasing aesthetics by breaking up the wall panels. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Councilmember Sparks inquired regarding the relationship between Belair Excavating <br /> 39 and Berger Transfer. Mr. Murlowski stated Belair Excavating is the contractor for Berger <br /> 40 Transfer. He explained that BDRS has been in business for about 20 years and is a <br /> 41 business unit of Berger Transfer that supplies record transfer. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Councilmember Horst asked if the applicant is using an economic basis to say the <br /> 44 building will not be constructed unless at this size and height. Mr. Murlowski stated it is <br /> 45 somewhat driven by economics. However, architecturally for height and aisle widths, if <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.