My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10142003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2003
>
CC PACKET 10142003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:58:17 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 10142003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> September 23, 2003 <br /> Page 11 <br /> 1 within the district. He noted Erickson's and Video Update had been removed. He also asked <br /> 2 regarding the status of the Equinox Apartments. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Mr. Cadwallader indicated he felt the City had picked and chosen who would be included and <br /> 5 excluded. He asked if US Bank had indicated they did not want to be part of the district and, <br /> 6 therefore, they were not part of it. He stated he did not want to be part of the district; however, <br /> 7 he had not been given a choice. He added his property had been rezoned and replatted before a <br /> 8 TIF district had been established. He asked why the City was taking these actions without <br /> 9 authority to do so. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Mr. Cadwallader agreed this had been a long, complicated process and asked why there was a <br /> 12 rush at this point in the process. He felt actions were being taken without a proper foundation, <br /> 13 even though he agreed the actions might be doable. Mr. Cadwallader asked that all of the <br /> 14 process be completed prior to taking action. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Bruce Malkerson, Malkerson Gilliland Martin LLP, noted he was the attorney representing Pratt- <br /> 17 Ordway, Inc. He stated he had a question regarding Resolution 03-082. He suggested the <br /> 18 following reports be added to paragraph 1.04,which referred to "certain written reports relating <br /> 19 to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein": NW Area Quadrant Plan and the update <br /> 20 of that plan, summary of inspections of findings by LHB Architects, full report of inspection <br /> 21 procedures and results for determining the qualification of the TIF district and building code and <br /> 22 conditions deficiencies report. He felt these reports should be included because they were part <br /> 23 of the overall study of the district. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Mr. Gilligan stated he agreed with Mr. Malkerson and indicated the third sentence in paragraph <br /> 26 1.04 should read as follows: These reports include the Summary of the Inspections and Findings <br /> 27 prepared by LHB, the Environmental and Asbestos Reports prepared by Braun Intertec, the NW <br /> 28 Quadrant Task Force Report and the NW Redevelopment Area Blight Analysis prepared by <br /> 29 DSU. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Mr. Malkerson indicated Stacie Kvilvang of Ehlers and Associates might also have a <br /> 32 presentation on blighting conditions in the area and asked if that should also be included. Mr. <br /> 33 Gilligan responded he was not aware of such a report. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Peter Beck stated he represented the owners and managers of the Apache Medical Building. He <br /> 36 indicated they had been concerned earlier in the process when the medical building had been <br /> 37 included in the potential PUD and were now pleased to see it was not a part of the PUD. He <br /> 38 stated the owners and managers of the Apache Medical Building would like confirmation that <br /> 39 the building was not included and access would not be closed to 39`h Avenue. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Mr. Beck explained the owners of the building were planning to renovate and reposition the <br /> 42 building in exciting ways. He noted it was understood the building was also in the TIF district, <br /> 43 which was more of a concern. He added, if the decision was made to make the investment in the <br /> 44 property, the primary concepts being pursued would require some measure of assistance. He <br /> 45 stated the owners would like to clarify that the intent of the building being in the TIF district <br /> 46 would not be that any investment made would generate TIF for the PUD but would be increment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.