My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 01201987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 01201987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:33:37 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 01201987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-9- <br /> City' s Assessmient.-_P61icy should require -Boulevard, property <br /> ... owners to. pay, f or the ..-improvements -because St.'--Anthony had- <br /> 'gotten the street.-under. an "easement grant" from the - - <br /> Minneapolis Park Board; <br /> contended- the- purpose of the -easement grant had been to <br /> provide access and egress to 35W;. <br /> sald the grant. was "from tree, to tree" and stipulated, that <br /> the- "City of, St. Anthony had to maintain all the distance <br /> between" ; <br /> said' he thought -a "different situation" existed for <br /> St. Anthony Boulevard residents who have no driveways and <br /> . -.now suffer an increase in traffic, which "could cause some <br /> 'of the homes to have lost some- of their value".; " <br /> indicated he, believed it was because the home owners had - <br /> fought to keep the road 32 feet wide that "we now have a <br /> beautiful, well done Boulevard" ; <br /> - recalled that the first residents" on that street had planted <br /> all the trees in the boulevards. <br /> Muriel Bochnak,- 2600- St. Anthony Boulevard: , . . <br /> - registered a- complaint about the "corner houses not being <br /> assessed. " <br /> - wanted, to know when the assessment-� policy which stipula ted <br /> this treatment had been- passed; <br /> wanted to know when the side -streets, - particularly- the <br /> :storm -sewers,,: would, be -reconstructed, saying she 'under- <br /> stood this, would e-liminate some of the- flooding. problems <br /> on the Boulevard; <br /> questioned -whether taxpayers would have to pay for, "trees- <br /> which will probablynot make it through the winter after- <br /> the contractor dug too close to them.-" ; <br /> reported -her flagstone sidewalk had to be replaced after <br /> - mistakenly being torn up ,by the , contractor; - .' '. <br /> "- told�-about a.,,workman who ,urinated- right in, front of her <br /> front window; <br /> was :.concerned-.-that-.her dinner guests the next- week-,might <br /> be -.,tagged,jor �parking- in front of- ,her home.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.