My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 04211987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 04211987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:23 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 04211987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:1 his measurements had been from the house to the •. <br /> .2 lot line �but he planned to put up a two foot . <br /> 3 overhang to match the rest of the structure; <br /> 4 <br /> 5 recognizing that the 'Ittner property to the south <br /> 6 had a lower grade, , he planned to do anything <br /> 7 which would be necessary to divert the runoff - <br /> 8 from his eaves away from that property; <br /> 9 <br /> 10 . -he expected the drainage would be improved with <br /> 11 the new structure and anyway, Mr. Childs had <br /> 12 said the City would see to it that the Ittner <br /> 13 property would not be harmed by his addition; <br /> 14 <br /> 15 -after being requested to consider delaying the <br /> 16 project, said he had lived in the house the way <br /> 17 it was since 1976 so a few more weeks shouldn' t <br /> 18 matter too much, however <br /> 19 <br /> 20 -he would be concerned if he were asked to wait <br /> 21 fora year or more just because the Ittner <br /> 22 house wasn' t sold. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Opponents: Mrs . Barbara Ittner, 3408 Roosevelt Street N.E. <br /> 25 and her spokesman, her grandson. - Paul Szurek, <br /> 26 3430 Benjamin Street N.E. • <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Mr. Szurek -told the Commissioners his grandfather had died <br /> 29 two weeks ago and Mrs. Ittner now lived at Chand- <br /> 30 ler Place; <br /> 31 <br /> 32 -said she "totally" opposed the construction of <br /> 33 the garage while she was trying to sell her home <br /> 34 because she was concerned about what effect the <br /> 35 construction might have on prospective buyers ; <br /> 36 <br /> 37 -indicated she felt- it would be better for the <br /> 38 new owners to have their say about the proposed <br /> 39 garage being so close to the home; and <br /> 40 <br /> 41 -said she was concerned about the potential run- <br /> 42 off damage to her house where she already had <br /> 43 problems with water in the basement; <br /> 44 <br /> 45 -wondered -with all the space he had in his back- <br /> 46 yard whether the garage could be redesigned to <br /> 47 meet' the setback requirements, in which case his <br /> 48 grandmother would have no right to object to the <br /> 49 addition; <br /> 50 <br /> 51 said he didn' t consider it would be unreasonable <br /> 52 to ask the Nelsons to delay their construction • <br /> 53 until the Ittner house is sold, probably within <br /> 54 the next six months or a year; <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.