My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05191987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 05191987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:45 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:34:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 05191987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-8- <br /> 1 . wanted to know why -Mr:- Schroeder -had--not been- required- to .grade • <br /> 2- :..the lot he was going .to buy . next: to•.him when, he had .been <br /> 3. :granted a variance for his .construction; <br /> 4 <br /> . 5 was: told : that was because that involved only one property and <br /> 6 this - issue involved 'a .subdivision for which the City likes <br /> 7 ' to have all grading agreed to before platting. :Mr. Childs <br /> 8 said Mr. Schroeder would have been required to do some grading <br /> 9 to develop his property as he had proposed. <br /> 10 <br /> .11 Dr. Robert- Osterbauer, 3504 .Belden Drive and son, Joseph <br /> 12 <br /> 13 -were told the _existing City Ordinances don' t require homes to <br /> -14 be at street level or address elevations of driveways but the <br /> 15 City does require that properties be developed in such a man- <br /> 16 -ner as not to negatively impact on the neighbors; <br /> 17 <br /> 18 -Dr. Osterbauer said he would prefer not to see- the. property <br /> 19 developed at all because the path which has been worn through . <br /> 20 the property over the years channels the runoff onto the street <br /> 21 and not onto his property; <br /> 22 <br /> 23 -the. Chair Pro Tem told them' the engineers .Mr. Evanson retained <br /> 24 would be advising him about what drainage would be required and <br /> 25 the developer would be unable to provide that information that <br /> 26 evening. <br /> 27 • <br /> 28 Mr. Forsberg: <br /> 29 <br /> 30 -reiterated that he hoped the Evanson property could be <br /> 31 developed as long as the developer is required to grade. his <br /> 32 property to .match what was required of him when he built his <br /> 33 home; <br /> 34 <br /> 35 he said the lawsuit had resulted when he had . asked to have the <br /> . 36 Evanson property sloped down to protect his property. He had <br /> 37 put in a retaining wall when that had not been. accomplished in <br /> 38 spite of both parties incurring substantial court costs. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Two prospective buyers of lots from Mr. Evanson expressed their <br /> 41- concerns about the resultant lots after the City' s requirements are <br /> 42 met. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Chris Paidosh, 3155 Old Highway 8 <br /> 45 <br /> 46 estimated the lot he was interested in buying was .16 feet off <br /> 47 street level and about even with the top of Dr. Osterbauer ' s <br /> 48 garage; <br /> 49 . <br /> 50 -said a -builder had told him the excavated dirt would have to be <br /> 5`1 taken from the site before a house could be built there; <br /> 52 • <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.