Laserfiche WebLink
Silver Lake 'Road, at least for the : present and.-instead, direct the <br /> applicant to prepare_ a final plat and a. grading. plan which would .be <br /> consistent with.-the City' s requirements and the neighbors' concerns about <br /> drainage and utility easements similar to those required for the Johnson <br /> and He_rtog subdivisions. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Nelson Request for Setback Variance .for Attached Garage, Etc.. at .3412 <br /> Roosevelt- Street N.E. Approved <br /> Application: from Dwayne and Nancy Nelson of the above address for a <br /> variance from the setback regulations of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance to allow construction of an addition to the <br /> south and west sides of the existing single car garage <br /> to within 6 feet of the south property line. <br /> Commission <br /> recommendation: Hansen indicated the Commission minutes had reflected <br /> the intent of the .Commission to not further delay action <br /> on the request; <br /> said the applicant and his adjoining neighbor had been <br /> given a month to settle their differences and the <br /> Ccmmission conclusion had been that it would not be <br /> fair to either party to delay a decision any further; <br /> indicated the Commission was now recommending Council <br /> approval of the proposed addition. <br /> Proponents : Nancy Nelson and her daughter, Kris, who indicated their <br /> desire to get on with the project. <br /> Opponents : no one was present to speak against the variances. <br /> Council Action <br /> Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks to grant Dwayne and Nancy Nelson a 4 <br /> foot sideyard setback variance for the 22 foot wide attached double <br /> garage they propose to construct on their property at 3.412 Roosevelt <br /> Street N.E. on the condition the gutter system is put in to drain runoff. <br /> away from the adjoining property. . <br /> In granting this variance, the Council finds, a$. did the Planning <br /> . .Commission, that: <br /> -the City had already given the neighbors a month to compromise their <br /> differences; <br /> • -any further delay would impose an undue hardship on the applicants ' <br /> plans for construction; <br />