My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 09151987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 09151987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:35:52 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:35:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 09151987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 3 <br /> 1: ' . : •100 units €or: gefteral occupancy and Kraus Anderson would construct <br /> 2 the commercial portion,. . <br /> , ' 3 The Manager said the H.R.A: would be reviewing those :proposals, looking <br /> 4 at each developers' financial strength and judging the proposals on how <br /> 5 they related--*to the design guidelines, etc. , which had -been established <br /> 6 for the project. He said- he -expected two of these companies to be. <br /> 7 interviewed prior to the Council meeting. and during the H.R.A. meeting <br /> . 8 scheduled to 'be'• held August 25th, with possibly one of them being <br /> - .9 selected at that time. . If one. developer is named that evening, :they . . <br /> 10 would be given * 30 days to workout a Redevelopers Agreement for doing- <br /> 11 the project., If no agreement is worked out by then, the next highest. . <br /> 12 ranking contractor would_ be -contacted to try to negotiate an acceptable <br /> . 13 agreement with the H.R.A. , according to Mr. Childs. He added that all <br /> 14 four developers had appeared to meet all minimum requirements for a <br /> 15- "solid" developer with the financial strength to do a project which <br /> 16 would meet the tax increment needs of the . City and all wanted to get <br /> 17 started right away. <br /> . 18 With public hearings required before both the Commission and Council <br /> 19 once a developer is selected, and the time it would probably take to <br /> 20 acquire the land, Mr. Childs said he thought it would probably not be <br /> 21 before spring when construction could start, even though a few of the <br /> V2 firms had indicated a willingness to get going by February. The Manager <br /> 23 then invited the Commissioners to look at the copies of the proposals <br /> 24 which are available' at .City Hall. <br /> 25 The Manager then brought the Chair -up to date on the new retail . center <br /> 26 being constructed west of the Apache Mall, saying he understood the <br /> 27 building had been constructed to the point where tenants could finish <br /> 28 them to their own needs. The next public hearing scheduled for that. <br /> 29 evening was opened at 7 : 50 P.M. , as scheduled. <br /> 30 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS - <br /> 31 .Request for Temporary Office Facility for Minnesota Scientific Gains <br /> 32 Recommendation for Approval Under Certain Conditions <br /> 33 *The Chair read the notice of the -hearing, which had been published in <br /> '34 the August 5th Bulletin and 'sent to all property owners of record within <br /> 35 350 feet of the. sub.ject property. No one present reported failure to, <br /> 36 receive the notice or objected -to its content. <br /> 37 Application: for a Special Use Permit to allow:Minnesota Scientific. . . <br /> 38 to locate- a .12 foot X 56 ,foot temporary mobile office on <br /> 39 -the east: side of -the building they lease from Donatelle <br /> 40 Properties at 3839 Chandler Drive,- until December, 1988 . <br /> 41 - Supporting <br /> &2' Documents: July. 29th letter , from'.the -Minnesota Scientific President, <br /> 43 Bruce LeVahn; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.