Laserfiche WebLink
1 Who Would Do Construction? <br /> 2 Mr. -Hamel said . Gaughan has own construction superintendents , <br /> 3 estirnatbrs' and support staff as well .as. general labor , .but not <br /> 4 own crews , . which .is -subbed out; <br /> 5 has full and part -time staff of about 190 people of whom. 3.5 <br /> 6 full time do nothing but construction and management. <br /> 7 Councilmember Makowske asked Mr. .. Hamel how he felt about_this <br /> 8 project. He responded by saying he considered it to be a good <br /> 9 project - for Gaughan because their major activity -is in the <br /> 10 northern suburbs where they 'do well and this project should fit in. <br /> 11 well with other developments in their portfolio for the region. . <br /> 12 The Gaughan executive indicated his firm had been too involved in <br /> 13 the Columbia Heights project in 1980 to seriously consider this <br /> 14 project at -that time; added that, after reading the 1980 feasibil- <br /> 15 ity study, wouldn' t have wanted to do the 495 units of condominiums <br /> 16 for the project at that time, but Pat Gaughan now feels he can fill <br /> 17 100 units of senior housing and 100 units of non-senior rental over <br /> 18 a reasonable marketing period. <br /> 19 Mr. Hamel pointed to the LaBelle Park 248 unit condominium project <br /> 20 close by in Columbia Heights as an example of a type of project <br /> 21 which he thought would- be very similar to the Kenzie Terrace • <br /> 22 project and one which had been very successful. <br /> 23 H.R.A. MAKES TOUGH CHOICE BETWEEN TWO EXCELLENT PROPOSALS <br /> 24 After Mr. Hamel had gone, -Mr . .Krier told the -H.R.A. members he. had <br /> 25 met .at least three -times with all the developers who had submitted <br /> 26 proposals for the project and at each meeting had requested .they . <br /> 27 update their proposals to meet H.R.A. requirements for brick <br /> 28 exteriors . He also said all developers had been alerted to the <br /> 29 part they would have to .play in working with the neighbors adjacent <br /> 30 to the project. <br /> 31 He distributed the responses he had gotten from Sherman-Boosalis <br /> 32 and said the Walker-Stuart Kraus-Anderson group proposal had been <br /> 33 for two; 4 story, , 80 unit residential buildings -which would be 70% . <br /> 34 , wood. and fully sprinkled. He said they .had offered to pay .nothing <br /> 35 for the land and estimated would - be paying . $215 , 000 a year in <br /> 36 taxes . - They would provide a $360 ,000 Letter of Credit but each <br /> '37 , company would be responsible. for, their own project; Walker, for ;:the <br /> 38 senior ; Stuart for the . market rate, -. and K-A ' ,for the commercial; . <br /> 39 and, if one failed,- ' all would not necessarily have to, fail. . . <br /> 40 Comments from H.R.A. and staff: <br /> 14 <br />