Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> 1 acknowledged that. there was -a dock on that .side but said <br /> 2 , by doing- that, the trailer would not be next to:.the . resi- <br /> 3 dence ,on Chandler Drive; <br /> 4 was told by' the •firm' president the building' s address is <br /> 5 . Chandler Drive -and even though there might. be an access., <br /> 6 on the far south .side : of the- building,. the Chandler Road <br /> 7 access would be easier in the winter; <br /> 8 Hansen was told the distance .the trailer could be sited <br /> 9 from the- building would depend on the type of wall <br /> 10 materials used and that the codes would be checked <br /> 11 regarding that _point before a building permit would be <br /> 12 issued; <br /> 13 questioned why the request had not reflected the firm' s <br /> 14 intent of moving when . the. lease expired in October; <br /> -15 was told by Mr. LeVahn that, with the kind of rents <br /> 16 Gelco charged, there was little chance the trailer <br /> 17 would be left on the site once Minnesota Scientific had <br /> 18 moved. ' <br /> •L9. Wingard was told by Mr. LeVahn that the existing ash <br /> 20 tree should not be disturbed when the trailer . is put in <br /> 21 place and that any sod which is damaged, would be- re 22 placed when his firm moves. <br /> 23 Franzese was told by Mr. Childs that he had been unable <br /> 24 to find records for specific permits for similar uses <br /> 25 although he recalled a request for a trailer next to <br /> 26 Central Engineering while that firm' s building was <br /> 27 . being expanded and that the trailer Elmwood Church had <br /> 28— indicated they needed during °construction had never been <br /> 29 put on that site. <br /> 30 Neighbor <br /> 31 Concerns: Bill Graff , 3824 Foss Road N.E. , ' indicated his only con- <br /> 32 cern was that when Minnesota Scientific moved out of <br /> 33 that the trailer be removed at the same time; <br /> 34- added, however,• that since Mr. LeVahn.had assured the <br /> 35- Commission that•would be :done; he•- would not be .against <br /> 36 the 'City granting the permit. <br /> 37 No other persons were. present to provide further input and the- Chair <br /> •. 38 -closed the' hearing at 8 : 03 P.M., for Commission consideration of a <br /> 39 recommendation ,-to the Council. . <br />