Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 1 Motion by 'Enrooth, seconded -by Marks to approve payment of $5 , 272. 67 • <br /> 2 as the Cityl' s share. of costs for work performed by Bruce Liesch <br /> 3 Associates ,' Inc. - . through November 4, 1987 in conjunction with the <br /> 4 City' s lawsuit against the U.S. Army et al relative to St. Anthony' s <br /> 5 water contamination problems . <br /> 6 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 7 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of $2 , 565 . 69 <br /> 8 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services rendered through <br /> 9 October 31 , 1987 with $1 , 063 . 75 of those costs to be paid from -the' <br /> 10 Liquor Fund. <br /> 11 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 12 Motion by Marks, seconded by Sundland to approve payment of $24 , 896 . 98 <br /> 13 to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for December sewer <br /> 14 services . <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Sundland to approve payment of . <br /> 17 $2 , 200 . 00 to Hance & LeVahn for legal services rendered during <br /> 18 December, 1987 , relative to St. Anthony prosecutions. <br /> 19 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 20 Councilmember Makowske arrived at 7 : 35 P.M. <br /> 21 Contractor' s Payment Tabled <br /> I <br /> 22 Copies of BWBR' s estimation of the amount due Fullerton Lumber for the <br /> 23 Stonehouse liquor warehouse project had been distributed by the City <br /> 24 Manager, who indicated there would be about $56 , 000 remaining on the <br /> 25 contract after the payment of $61 , 078 . <br /> 26 The contractors had. been granted a ten day extension, which would <br /> 27 expire December 9th, and had indicated it would be into January before <br /> 28 the project would be totally completed. Even though the original <br /> 29 deadline was December lst , had the project been completed by October <br /> 30 1st , as the contractor had originally said it would, there would have <br /> 31 been time for the City to get the space ready for the holiday season, <br /> 32 Mr. Childs ' said. He added that there had been some unanticipated <br /> 33 costs for the project, including the architect' s time and costs for <br /> 34 extra inspections due to the contractor ' s errors, including improper <br /> 35 pouring of footings , problems with structural steel, etc . <br /> 36 There is no penalty -clause in this contract, Mr. Childs told the <br /> 37 Mayor, and he said he wasn' t certain withholding payment at this time <br /> 38 would do much good since the contractor had the option to stop work <br /> 39 until payment is made . However , he agreed to prepare a complete • <br /> 2 <br />