My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08201991
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1991
>
PL PACKET 08201991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:42:12 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:42:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1990-1991
SP Name
PL PACKET 08201991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 18, 1991 <br /> Page 7 <br /> • 1 Natural Resources encourages that structures be built no less than 75 feet from <br /> 2 the lake in order to preserve sight lines and in order to prevent the building of <br /> 3 structures which might cause runoff into the lake. These conditions have <br /> 4 created an excessive number of variance requests. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 The objectives of creating the new zoning district are to eliminate the excessive <br /> 7 number of variance requests while continuing to protect the water quality of <br /> 8 Silver Lake, which can be harmed by numerous impervious structures built too <br /> 9 close to the lake. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 City Manager Burt participated in discussions with both the City Attorney and <br /> 12 the lake residents' ad hoc committee. The alternative of changing the 30-foot <br /> 13 street setback requirement was considered. City Manager Burt stated that <br /> 14 decreasing the 30-foot setback requirement would limit the space necessary for <br /> 15 wintertime snow storage. Increasing the 30-foot setback requirement would <br /> 16 cause even more difficulties for those building on smaller lots. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 City Manager Burt informed the Planning Commission that the City Council has. <br /> 19 already had two readings of the proposed ordinance and that the third reading <br /> 20 is required in order to pass the ordinance. Existing structures are, of course, <br /> 21 grandfathered in, but any structure beyond repair which needs to be rebuilt <br /> • <br /> 22 would require a building permit. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 In response to the question by Commissioner Faust, City Manager Burt <br /> 25 responded that any new construction must be reviewed. by the Watershed <br /> 26 District, and that the DNB's 75-foot setback is a recommendation and not a law, <br /> 27 although it has been respected to date. He stated that the passing of the new <br /> 28 ordinance will compensate for the lack of a St. Anthony shoreline preservation <br /> 29 act. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 City Manager Burt continued that the City is attempting to determine which <br /> 32 kinds of structures will not cause runoff into the lake and might, therefore, be <br /> 33 built closer than 75 feet from the shoreline. It has so far been suggested that <br /> 34 structures with pervious surfaces such as decks can be built to within fifty feet <br /> 35 of the lakeshore, but that structures with impervious surfaces such as cement <br /> 36 patios should be built no closer than 75 feet from the lakeshore. Swimming <br /> 37 pools have never been considered structures and could, therefore, be built <br /> 38 within the fifty-foot limit. Preservation of a fifty-foot sight line around the lake <br /> 39 was determined to be adequate. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Commissioner Murphy suggested that the ordinance should address the ratio <br /> 42 of impervious surface to lot size. City Manager Burt replied that the City is in <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.