My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06151993
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1993
>
PL PACKET 06151993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:26:42 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:26:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1993
SP Name
PL PACKET 06151993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DORSEY 8c WHITNEY <br /> Mr. Thomas D. Burt May 25, 1993 <br /> Page 2 <br /> permit. If the sign has existed by reason of variance or by reason of nonconforming <br /> status under the ordinance, it is rather difficult to deal differently with what in effect <br /> is the same sign with different information on it, when there is no change in the <br /> size, location, etc. Technically, the Council might be able to deny a variance even <br /> though one was previously granted, on the theory that it is not bound by a prior <br /> Council's actions. On the other hand, it becomes rather difficult to make findings of <br /> fact sufficient to support the denial of a variance when there are previous findings <br /> of fact by the Council to the contrary. <br /> If a new permit were not required in such cases, this could save a considerable <br /> amount of administrative time for the staff, Planning Commission and Council. <br /> You could include under the list of signs requiring no permit in Section 1400.08, a <br /> provision such as the following: <br /> A business identification sign designed to replace an existing business <br /> identification sign which lawfully exists under this Code, so long as the new <br /> sign has the same dimensions and is in the same location as the existing sign, <br /> And is not a prohibited sign under Section 1400.07. <br /> If you have any further questions in this regard, please let me know. <br /> Very true yours, <br /> re <br /> WRS:gle William R. Soth <br /> Enclosures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.