My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08161994
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1994
>
PL PACKET 08161994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:28:35 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:28:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1994
SP Name
PL PACKET 08161994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br /> June 21, 1994 <br /> 40 Page 9 <br /> 1 Chair Gondorchin proposed the applicants not add the dentists' names to the sign, <br /> 2 instead a landmark name only, which he believed would far better identify the facility. <br /> 3 Motion by Faust, second by Makowske to recommend the City Council approve the <br /> 4 variance for a ground sign from Belair Builders for the dental complex on 39th and <br /> 5 Silver Lake Road and that the sign not exceed a total of 68 square feet, 34 square feet <br /> 6 on each side. In Commissioner Makowskes' second of the motion, he added the <br /> 7 addendum that the current signage with the doctors' names appended to the sign would <br /> 8 be insufficient; that the existing ordinance creates a hardship because it does not permit <br /> 9 the proper identification of the dentists in the facility; and that the sign ordinance <br /> 10 pertaining to ground signs is in a state of review. <br /> 11 Interim City Manager Hamer brought up the bonus issue which he felt could possibly <br /> 12 be a consideration when making this recommendation. The Chair explained that the <br /> 13 sign's height could be increased, however, the signage could not be increased. <br /> 14 Gondorchin noted, too, that the Planning Commission has been trying to phase out <br /> 15 and/or eliminate the bonus. <br /> 6 Commissioner Franzese added that at the present time the ordinance states that for <br /> 1 every foot a sign is less than the maximum height permitted, there will be allowed an <br /> 18 additional 4 square feet of sign surface area up to a total of 12 additional square feet. <br /> 19 The consensus of the Commissioners was that that is a moot point. <br /> 20 Chair Gondorchin clarified as an amendment to the motion, that the Planning <br /> 21 Commissioners are not taking into consideration any bonuses for landscaping and/or <br /> 22 height. <br /> 23 Voting on the motion: <br /> 24 Aye: Makowske, Gondorchin, Franzese, Horst, Faust <br /> 25 Nay: Thompson <br /> 26 Motion carried. <br /> 27 Chair Gondorchin urged the applicant to attend the Council's June 28, 1994 meeting <br /> 28 when they will review the request. <br /> 29 VI. MISCELLANEOUS. <br /> 0 A. Ground Signs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.