My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08161994
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1994
>
PL PACKET 08161994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:28:35 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:28:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1994
SP Name
PL PACKET 08161994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Products Inc. <br /> Page 2 • <br /> During the review of all MPCA's file concerning the above mentioned site, I did not detect <br /> any dissatisfaction with work completed on site , only the timeliness of the work <br /> performed. Mi. Yingling stated to me in a telephone conversation that she would <br /> appreciate the continuance of the project in a well planned and coordinated effort that <br /> would resolve issues presented by the MPCA. Please take note of the recommendation <br /> portion of Ms. Yingling's September 3, 1992, review, stating,"CAD not approved, request <br /> additional Remedial Investigation". This statement is consistent throughout the MPCA file. <br /> Complete the required work and the MPCA will partially approve the CAD issued Nova. <br /> My recommendation is to complete the following. <br /> Complete the most recent request stated by the MPCA. The tasked <br /> requested are not significant and will help this project to reach the final goal <br /> of reimbursement. <br /> Request that Nova or the following consultant to assemble all monitoring <br /> data for the past three years into one single report for implementation into <br /> an updated CAD. Because of the lapse of time the best recommendation <br /> would be to organize the site and site activities. This would show the <br /> MPCA of your interest to work with them as a responsible property owner. • <br /> Each of the above recommendations are only stating the obvious, the MPCA <br /> would like to see some progress and you will have to spend some money to <br /> achieve these results. The best advice is to shop around for the best prices <br /> for the eventual work that will occur. <br /> The MPCA will most likely approve a CAD upon the-completion of the <br /> above scope of services. This approval will allow you to seek <br /> reimbursement for any funds spent in the past. A question of <br /> reimbursement that will still need to be asked is if the current property <br /> owner receives reimbursement from monies spent by the previous owner. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to review this file. I will continue to look for a cost savings <br /> approach to completing the next portion of site work at your property. If you would like <br /> EPI to gather all the loose parts of this project, manage future activities in a cost effective <br /> and timely manner, please feel free to call. <br /> Sincerely <br /> Daniel L. Flaig <br /> General Manager; EPl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.