My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 04181996
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1996
>
PL PACKET 04181996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:31:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1996
SP Name
PL PACKET 04181996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.il <br /> • B. LNIC/SRA. Contemplates a one-time payment not to exceed the amount expected <br /> to cover the City's costs of administration, inspection, and enforcement. <br /> IV. Restoration and Relocation. Both Ordinances require that the company promptly <br /> restore the property to the same or better condition than existed prior to the work; both <br /> provide that 'the City may complete restoration at company's expense, if the company <br /> does not complete; and both provide that the City must approve any relocation of <br /> facilities, equipment, etc. <br /> Both Ordinances also provide that the City may require relocation, at company expense, <br /> in the exercise of City's police power. In all other cases (where relocation is not within <br /> City's police power) the expenses may be apportioned by agreement between the <br /> company and City. <br /> A. Bernick and Lifson. The B&L Ordinance provides nothing further with respect <br /> to restoration and relocation. <br /> B. LMC/SRA. Provides that in the event a Court determines that City required <br /> relocation was not within the police power authority of the City, such relocation <br /> shall be at the expense of the City. <br /> V. Company Default. Both Ordinances provide that in the event a permitted company is <br /> in default under its permit the City may terminate the permit, and take such action as is <br /> • necessary to abate or cure any condition caused by the default, at company's expense. <br /> VI. Indemnification. Both Ordinances provide for indemnification of the City for any <br /> claims relating to facilities located in the PROW. <br /> VII. Other Conditions. Both Ordinances provide that facilities, equipment, etc. must be <br /> placed in a location and in such manner (above or below ground) as is designated by the <br /> City in the permit. Such location must not endanger or interfere with the customary <br /> traffic, travel and use of the affected PROW and a permitted company must take <br /> reasonable precautions to ensure that the facilities, etc. do not endanger or damage <br /> persons or property. <br /> A. Bernick and Lifson. The B&L Ordinance specifically provides that if a company <br /> obstructs or alters any street or other PROW used for traffic, the company will <br /> guard such obstruction and use appropriate signs and warning Iights to protect the <br /> public. <br /> B. LMC/SRA. Provides nothing further with respect to other permit conditions. <br /> VIII. Applicability to Existing Facilities. Both Ordinances provide that companies must <br /> comply with such Ordinance upon the effective date thereof and that the City may adopt <br /> suitable regulations and schedules for administration of the permits. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.