My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 12182001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 12182001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:39:51 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:39:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 12182001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br /> November 20, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 Vice Chair Stille asked if he has ever had any problems with employees being <br /> 2 unable to work for reasons associated to the fragrance. Mr. Levitus stated <br /> 3 through hundreds of employees over an eight-year period,no one has ever been <br /> 4 sick from the fragrances: <br /> 5 Commissioner Steeves asked what other types of manufacturing processes use <br /> 6 wax. Mr. Levitus stated that wax was used to coat cheeses, and in the cosmetics <br /> 7 industry. <br /> 8 Chair Melsha asked Mr. Levitus about any other options of candle-making that <br /> 9 were more environmentally safe. Mr. Levitus indicated that the process that they <br /> 10 use is the most commercially, and environmentally safe way to make candles. <br /> 11 Resident Doug Tanner, 2206 St. Anthony Parkway,expressed his concern about <br /> 12 the property across the street from the discussed location, where he lives. He <br /> 13 stated that in the early 90's,there was a bad smell associated with the product that <br /> 14 was manufactured there. He added that residents from the area took the proper <br /> 15 steps, which eventually led to calling Pollution Control. Pollution Control <br /> 16 essentially told them that they were not going to die from the smell,or the <br /> 17 contents. <br /> 18 Mr. Tanner added that he would be very concerned about an odor coming from <br /> 19 the area that did not cause allergies, nor head-aches, but was a nuisance. His <br /> 20 concern was that, if there was an odor coming from the manufacturing plant, <br /> 21 would it be fixed, and would the city be pro-active in helping to eliminate the <br /> 22 odor. <br /> 23 Resident, Steve Valuk, 2614 37'Avenue Northeast, stated that he and his wife <br /> 24 have been renovating their home, and are concerned about the potential odor, <br /> 25 which would diminish the value of their home. He stated that his main concern <br /> 26 was with the smell, and associated problems. <br /> 27 Resident, Dave Zurbey, also lives close to the plant, and was also concerned with <br /> 28 the odor, as well as the sewer system. Mr. Levitus stated that there is no excess <br /> 29 wax in the process,thus, zero effect on the sewer system. <br /> 30 Resident, Jerome Shaddrick, 2510/2508 37'Avenue Northeast,also lives across <br /> 31 form the property. He stated that he has worked with an electrical contractor and <br /> 32 has had some experience with candle manufacturing. He stated that no matter <br /> 33 how many filters they put on the equipment,there is still an odor that is produced <br /> 34 and cannot be contained. <br /> 35 Resident, Mary Jo Pollak, lives across the street from the area. She stated that she <br /> 36 unpacks candles as part of her job and that the smell is strong and lasts for a very <br /> 37 long time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.