My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 10212003
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2003
>
PL PACKET 10212003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:44:09 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:44:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 10212003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> September 16, 2003 <br /> Page 6 <br /> 1 Mr. Crockrow clarified his understanding that the Planning Commission would prefer that the <br /> 2 sign language be revised and presented to the Planning Commission for further review at next <br /> 3 month's meeting and then present to City Council. Chair Melsha confirmed that this would be <br /> 4 their preference. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Vice Chair Stille asked if Subway could use a temporary sign until everything has been <br /> 7 approved. Wally Furnanda, Subway, explained that his Development Agent has stated that they <br /> 8 are having issues with the sign noting that he does not know, in depth, what has transpired. He <br /> 9 stated that he would discuss this further with his Development Agent adding that he would like a <br /> 10 swift resolution to this issue because the opening is planned for October 1, 2003. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Chair Melsha asked if there is anything they could do, on a short-term basis, until a decision is <br /> 13 made. Mr. Furnanda stated that he would go forward with whatever is recommended. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Commissioner Hanson asked if the Subway Corporation would prevent them from opening <br /> 16 without the proper signage. Mr. Furnanda confirmed that this could be a possibility and <br /> 17 reviewed his concerns with the Commission. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Vice Chair Stille clarified that the only issue with the Subway sign is the color. Mr. Crockrow <br /> 20 confirmed that color is the issue. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Chair Melsha suggested including an amendment to add yellow and revise to include <br /> 23 dimensions. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Mr. Crockrow suggested including a revision that the logos would be no larger than 3x6 feet <br /> 26 adding that everything else is covered. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Commissioner Hoska suggested that no more than two logo signs be allowed. Mr. Crockrow <br /> 29 explained that Bumper to Bumper is unique adding that he cannot imagine any other tenant <br /> 30 requiring two logos. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Commissioner Hanson stated that there is another national tenant that is considering a location in <br /> 33 the center and that this issue will come before them again. He stated that he sees two issues, <br /> 34 adding yellow versus red and the size of the sign. He asked what portion of the 60%would be <br /> 35 allowed for a logo sign. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Chair Melsha stated one 3x6 logo sign is reasonable adding that two logo signs are too much. <br /> 38 He stated that a public hearing.is not the place to negotiate these issues. Commissioner Tillman <br /> 39 agreed stating that the dimensions and percentages should be worked out. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Owner-Bumper to Bumper stated that they are ok with waiting until next month on the signage. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Mr. Crockrow asked the Commission if they could accommodate Subway due to their meeting <br /> 44 with City Council next week. He suggested that they work on the rest of the signage criteria for <br /> 45 review next month. He explained that the Subway sign is uniform nationwide and <br /> 46 acknowledged the need to conform to city ordinance. He acknowledged that the City of St. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.