CC PACKET 02101987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-7- • - indicated he could see where the City might want to restrict parking for unrelated members of the household; agreed that there is a lot of "junk" parked in yards around the Village which should be removed; reiterated that, if any of those vehicles were really collectibles, their owners would never leave them un- covered outdoors to rust; stated his problem was with the change which would restrict unrelated persons to three in a single family home; indicated that to the best of his recollection, he had been told by both Councilmember Ranallo and Mr. Childs that he could "rent out his two extra bedrooms to as many as three persons" ; reported he only had one roommate at this time but wanted to be able to rent the other bedroom to a couple if he needed the extra rent to meet his mortgage pay- ments on that $85 , 000 house; • - considered it unfair that a six member family would be allowed to have two boarders under the proposed amend- ments but agreed that having six unrelated persons living in a home as the Ordinance now allows was just too many; - said he had called a number of cities to see how many they allowed and found the majority of them restricted unrelated persons to four which seemed to him to be more appropriate for St. Anthony; contended the complaints which had caused the Council to want to change the Ordinance had not really been about the number of people living in a home but had rather been about the number of cars in front that that gen- erated; acknowledged his parking a beer truck around the Vil- lage for five years had caused problems in the past; but said he had removed it when asked and was now paying $980 a year to store it and a large boat he owns; - indicated he wouldn' t have a problem with an Ordinance which allowed a -homeowner to park a campe or large boat • on the grass in the back yard; but