Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br /> Silver Lake Road, at least, for° 'the . •present .and. instead, direct the <br /> applicant to prepare a fi�na-1 ,-pl-at-..: and a, .. grading plan which would be <br /> consistent-' with- -the-,City' s requirements and the neighbors' concerns about <br /> drainage and -uti-lity easements. similar- to those required for -the Johnson <br /> and Hertog subdivisions. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Nelson Request for, Setback Variance -for Attached Garage, Etc... at 3412 <br /> Roosevelt Street N.E. Approved <br /> Application: from Dwayne -and 'Nancy Nelson of the .aboveaddress for a <br /> variance- from the setback regulations of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance to . allow construction of an addition to -the <br /> south and- west sides of the existing single car garage <br /> to within 6 .feet of the south property line. <br /> Commission <br /> recommendation: 'Hansen indicated the Commission minutes had reflected <br /> the intent of the Commission to not further delay action <br /> on the request;. <br /> said the applicant and his adjoining neighbor had been <br /> • _. given a month to settle their differences and the <br /> Cemmission 'conclusion had been that it would not be <br /> fair to either party to delay a decision any further; <br /> indicated the Commission was now recommending .Council <br /> approval of the, proposed addition. <br /> Proponents: Nancy Nelson and her daughter, Kris-, who indicated their <br /> desire to get on with the project. <br /> Opponents: no one was present to speak against the variances. <br /> Council Action <br /> Motion by Enrooth; . seconded by Marks to grant Dwayne and Nancy Nelson .a 4 <br /> foot sideyard setback variance for the 22 foot wide attached double . <br /> "garage they propose to construct on their property - at 341.2 Roosevelt <br /> Street N.E. ' on the condition the gutter system is put in to drain runoff <br /> away from the adjoining property. <br /> In- granting this variance, the Council finds, as. did the Planning <br /> Commission, that: - <br /> -the City had already given the neighbors a month to compromise their <br /> differences; <br /> any further delay would impose an undue hardship on -the applicants ' <br /> plans for construction; - <br />