Laserfiche WebLink
1 The Chair commented that he perceived the Commission recommendatio, <br /> 2 had to be for denial since the above had been so clearly defeated. <br /> 3 Franzese told Commissioner Hansen that "without all the qualifiers <br /> 4 you put on the motion, I could have voted for the variance because I <br /> 5 agreed that it was just an extension of the one the City granted in <br /> 6 1966 and the addition wouldn't change the existing building <br /> 7 alignment. <br /> 8 Nagger and Werenicz indicated they continued to have problems with <br /> 9 the answers on the application. <br /> 10 Auplication Withdrawn <br /> 11 Mr. Tomas stated that he was just going to apply for a building <br /> 12 permit for a detached garage and he hoped "the Commission would be <br /> 13 happy with all those vehicles parked on the street and around the <br /> 14 yard. " The Chair advised him that sometimes the Council reverses the <br /> 15 Commission recommendation. The applicant left muttering some <br /> 1-6 uncomplimentary phrases -about his--neighbor-. <br /> 17 011M BUSINESS <br /> 18 Commissioners Invited to Attend Carbon Filtration Dedication <br /> 19 Mr. Childs indicated they would all be welcome to attend the ceremo <br /> 20 at the site at 6:00 P.M. , July 26 , 1988 , where the City's "Cle <br /> 21 Water" would be toasted with that beverage instead of champagne. <br /> 22 New Operators to Remove the Controversial Roof Sign on Mickey D's <br /> 23 Restaurant <br /> 24 The Manager reported the new proprietor had told him he wanted to <br /> 25 keep the name because of its customer perception about good food <br /> 26 being served there. In addition to removing the controversial sign <br /> 27 from the roof, Mr. Childs indicated the new restaurant owner was <br /> 28 going to apply for two signs, one in the front and the other on the <br /> 29 side facing St. . Anthony Boulevard, the total of which would not <br /> 30 exceed what the City allowed. that building. However, he would be <br /> 31 willing to keep only the front sign if that was the City's decision. <br /> 32 Apartment Project and Transfer of Parkview Appear to be Realities <br /> 33 Before the meeting adjourned, the City Manager gave a brief report <br /> 34 on what was happening in conjunction with both projects. He said he <br /> 35 expects Lang-Nelson to be named the developer for the third phase of <br /> 36 the Kenzie Terrace Redevelopment Project at the next Council meeting <br /> 37 and anticipates the closing on the Parkview building to be held the <br /> 38 first week in August unless more environmental problems crop up to <br /> 39 make that purchase unfeasible. <br /> 12 <br />