CC PACKET 06191990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• 2 1 Page 11, line 16: Correct typo "he" before "had" . 2 Page 13 , line 12 : Correct typos "as" and "remained" . 3 Page 13 , line 41: Correct typo "any" . 4 Page 15, line 4 : Insert "wife of all before "Commissioner" . 5 Page 15, line 24 : Correct typo "Wagner" . 6 Page 16, line 23 : Correct typo "also" . 7 Page 16, line 24: Correct typo "was" . 8 Page 16, line 26: Substitute "sides" for "side" . 9 Page 17 , line 10: Insert "to" before "the Kenzington" . 10 Page 17 , lines 14, 15, and 16 should indicate that the H.R.A. would be 11 negotiating with the LaNel Company for a handicap 12 pedestrian ramp across the parking lot to the 13 shopping center to accommodate the Autumn Woods and 14 the Walker Apartments in return for another Kenzie 15 Terrace curb cut to access the driveway next to 16 Autumn Woods Building C. 17 Motion carried unanimously. 18 COMMISSIONER BROWNELL TO REPRESENT PLANNING COMMISSION AT MAY 22ND 19 COUNCIL MEETING. 20 PUBLIC HEARINGS 21 Commission Repeats Recommendation of Denial for Front Yard Variance for 22 2608/10 - 37th Avenue N.E. Double Bungalow 23 The hearing was opened at 8 :25 P.M. with no one present reporting 24 failure to receive the Notice of Hearing or objecting to its content. 25 Ms. VanderHeyden reported that because a modified proposal had been 26 presented by the applicants at the April 24th Council meeting, the 27 Council had directed it to be returned to the Planning Commission for 28 their recommendation. The Assistant to the City Manager indicated the 29 applicants proposed turning the two garages around to face each other, 30 thus eliminating three feet from the requested variance. However, staff 31 had since determined that there is an it foot right-of-way in front of 32 the property which legally cannot have cars parked on it. This would 33 also leave only seven feet' between the right-of-way and the proposed 34 garages, which would not be sufficient room for an automobile to be 35 parked. 36 Staff's concerns about vehicles being parked so close to the busy 37 street, especially when it's being plowed, as well as whether sufficient 38 ground cover for utility lines would be provided with the proposed 39 construction, had not been alleviated with the new proposal, Ms. 40 VanderHeyden added. 41 Mr. Burt reported a measurement of the distance between the existing . 42 house and the curbline by staff had confirmed a 35 foot setback from the 43 property line which, with the it foot right-of-way, would leave 46 feet 44 between the house and the street.