My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 10261993
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1993
>
CC PACKET 10261993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:26:28 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:26:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 10261993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br /> 2 OCTOBER 12 , 1993 • <br /> 3 PAGE 4 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 The City Manager advised these charges are for the City to use <br /> 7 its own wells . He noted that they have increased each year and <br /> 8 this increase is anticipated to continue. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Discussion followed what would happen if these charges were <br /> 11 not paid. The City Manager felt the DNR would probably go to <br /> 12 the Legislature to have penalties placed on non-payments or it <br /> 13 could be taken from the City ' s Local Governmant Aid alloca- <br /> 14 tion . <br /> 15 <br /> 16 These charges were viewed as classic examples of unfunded <br /> 17 mandates placed on the City by the State. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Councilmember Marks felt paying them was an admission of <br /> 20 culpability for the City . <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Members of the Council requested this example of unfunded <br /> 23 mandates be brought to the attention to elected representa- <br /> 24 ti'ves of the City. The City Manager was requested to draft a <br /> 25 letter which addressed this issue to Senator Marty and <br /> 26 Representative McGuire. <br /> 27 •28 It was noted that the Department of Health and three other <br /> 29 state departments request the same information as the DNR and <br /> 30 do not charge for it . <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 33 <br /> 34 D. City of New Brighton <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Motion by Marks, second by Enrooth to approve payment in the <br /> 37 amount of $9, 275. 00 -to the City of New Brighton for the <br /> 38 purchase of its sewer jetting machine. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 The City Manager stated that these funds will be taken from <br /> 41 the City' s Water Fund. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 44 <br /> 45 E. Verified Claims <br /> 46 <br /> 47' Motion by Wagner , second by Marks to approve payment of the <br /> 48 five pages. of verified. claims as prepared by the Finance <br /> 49 Director . <br /> 50 Motion carried unanimously <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.