My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06121995
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1995
>
CC PACKET 06121995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:24:52 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:24:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
22
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1994-1998
SP Name
CC PACKET 06121995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Members of the City Council <br /> City of St. Anthony, Minnesota <br /> Liquor Inventory <br /> Liquor inventory increased approximately $50,000 or 12.5% in 1994 compared to 1993. <br /> This increase was attributed to an increase in beer purchases at year end (a 6 to 8 <br /> week supply) to avoid a price increase. anticipated in 1995 and an increase in wine <br /> merchandise (new product items) . As a result, wine merchandise accounted for 30% of <br /> the total inventory; whereas, wine sales accounted for 16.8% of total sales. The <br /> concern is that perhaps some of the wine inventory contains slow moving and possibly <br /> obsolete merchandise, which should-be properly reduced to retail value for inventory <br /> purposes (if less than cost ). Discussions with the liquor manager revealed that an <br /> effort to turnover- certain wine merchandise was in process with the result being the <br /> elimination of older, slow moving products. This process was on-going and was not <br /> completed at year end and with the purchase of new products resulted in a higher <br /> than normal wine inventory. <br /> The taking of liquor inventory at year end appeared to be accurate and conducted in <br /> an orderly fashion based upon inventory observation and test counts performed. How- <br /> ever, at the SAV II outlet, it was noted that when inventory merchandise is located <br /> in more than one area in the store, the quantity in all areas is combined and listed <br /> as a single quantity in the inventory records. Current practice is to change the <br /> original count to reflect the additional quantity counted; it would be an improvement <br /> in inventory procedures if the different counts were listed separately in the, inven- <br /> tory records. This practice made matching inventory test counts with the inventory <br /> • listing difficult, especially when resolving inventory differences. In addition, <br /> after the counts were completed and the listings combined by product for input into <br /> the computer, the original counts were erased and a single total recorded. This pro- <br /> cedure prevented testing the mathematical accuracy of combining the .various counts. <br /> The erasure of original counts or information should not be permitted. As much detail <br /> supporting the inventory should be retained, without being altered. Given the liquor <br /> industry's nutrition rate in personnel , proper inventory instructions and procedures <br /> should be reviewed' with. persons assigned to counting inventory prior to all future <br /> inventories. <br /> The gross profit percentages (based on actual sales and costs) by product line com- <br /> pared quite favorably with percentages provided by the manager. The only major excep- <br /> tion was tobacco sales at the SAV II outlet. Based upon accounting records it appears <br /> that the store incurred a slight loss on sales from tobacco products, compared to the <br /> mark up percentage of 20%. Record keeping for this variance was unavailable, although <br /> the manager is going to discuss and review this situation with the store manager. <br /> Recycling Grants <br /> Better grant documentation is needed to support the reimbursements requested from the <br /> counties. During the audit, staff was unable to locate grant reimbursement requests <br /> filed for the first half of the year for recycling grants. However, it appears reim- <br /> bursement of costs incurred and charged to the program were filed properly. Copies <br /> of requests and sufficient supporting documentation should be maintained in the appro- <br /> priate files to permit staff to prepare and submit the necessary documentation for <br /> reimbursement in the event that personnel changes occur in employees who are respon- <br /> sible for administration of the program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.