Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor and Council <br /> May 14, 1996 • <br /> Page 2 <br /> limit stormwater retention at this site, the city wanted to consider whether a partial <br /> implementation of the diversion and stormwater storage alternative suggested in the 1992 study . <br /> offered any flood reduction benefits. This study reports the benefits of constructing a stormwater <br /> pond on this parcel and a relief storm sewer along Wilson Street (shown on Figure 1), without <br /> construction of the other elements of the diversion-storage alternative illustrated in the 1992 <br /> report. <br /> Partial Implementation of the Diversion-Storage Alternative in the 1992 Report <br /> To provide relief, any improvements will have to make maximum use of available storm sewer <br /> capacity, and provide a place for excess runoff to accumulate (other than in the areas now <br /> experiencing some flooding): <br /> The existing storm sewer in Wilson Street is already overloaded when it reaches 29th Street, <br /> so maximum use of capacity can be achieved by simply eliminating any connections to the <br /> existing storm sewer system along Wilson Street between 29th Avenue and 27th Avenue; flows <br /> from areas north of 29th Avenue will continue to use the existing storm sewer system to flow <br /> past those low-lying areas. <br /> Meanwhile, the areas between 29th Avenue and 27th Avenue will be drained by an additional <br /> storm sewer system along Wilson Street, from Murray Avenue south to the alley south of <br /> 27th Avenue NE, and then west to the proposed storage pond in watershed 6A-5 (see Figure 1). <br /> The new relief storm sewer system would collect runoff from the watersheds between 29th <br /> Avenue and 27th Avenue and direct it to the new stormwater pond, thus providing relief to the <br /> low-lying areas between 29th Avenue and 27th Avenue. The storm sewer on St. Anthony <br /> Boulevard at Coolidge Avenue would be bulkheaded to direct runoff west of Coolidge Street <br /> into the new storm sewer system. The proposed pond, located in the east end of the existing <br /> trailer park parcel, would provide approximately 19 acre-feet of storage, and would require <br /> acquisition of approximately 6.5 acres of land. <br /> The estimated order-of-magnitude cost of the relief storm sewer and pond is summarized in <br /> Table 1. Assuming a total cost of$1.5 million and an annual interest rate of 8 percent, the <br /> estimated annual cost for construction of the system over a 20-year period is about $152,000 per <br /> year. <br /> With the additional storm sewer system in place, the model predicts a reduction in 100-year flood <br /> levels of only 0.3 to 0.8 feet. The larger flood level reductions are near Murray Avenue; the <br /> smaller reductions occur near Pahl Avenue (the existing depth of flooding from the 100-year storm <br /> event in this area is typically less than 2 feet). While some reduction in damages would be <br /> achieved, and there would apparently be slightly fewer homes affected, greater reductions of the <br /> flood level are desirable. Greater reductions cannot be achieved because: <br /> Runoff from the area north of 29th Avenue that cannot find room to flow in the existing storm <br /> sewer system, flows overland and accumulates in the problem areas, adding to the water that <br /> must be handled by the new relief storm sewer. <br /> The proposed ponding area is simply not big enough to completely accept and store all the local <br /> runoff plus the overflow runoff from the watershed north of 29th Avenue. <br /> The approximate number of homes and outbuildings located in the existing and revised 100-year • <br /> floodplain are listed in Table 2. It appears that construction of the new storm sewer system would <br />