My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08261997
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1997
>
CC PACKET 08261997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:34:48 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:34:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
22
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1994-1998
SP Name
CC PACKET 08261997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG. -21' 91 (THU) 16: 24 # $ TEL;612 421 9511 P. 010 <br /> Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> August 19, 1997 <br /> Page 10 <br /> 1 Vice Chair Makowske stated this was checked and the City Attorney indicated there is only a <br /> 2 conflict of interest if the Planning Commissioner will derive direct economic benefit by the way <br /> 3 they vote on the proposed project. He explained the need for the Planning Commission to find a <br /> 4 hardship when considering a variance request. Vice Chair Makowske encouraged the applicant to <br /> 5 make creative use of the property. <br /> 6 Mr. DeZelar stated the City's ordinances create the hardship and to fulfill the required parking <br /> 7 spaces it will create a hardship because they will need to displace homes and families. If not <br /> 8 approved, it will pull away from the worship functions which go on in today's churches. <br /> 9 Vice Chair Makowske suggested when the formal application is presented to the Planning <br /> 10 . Commission, that the applicant be prepared to speak to the hardship issue, the parking shortage, <br /> 11 the lot coverage issue, and landscaping. <br /> 12 Commissioner Horst stated he believes it will be difficult to find a hardship or to determine there <br /> 13 is no other building which could be built. He stated he would like to find a way, if possible, for <br /> 14 the project to be exempted from that setback requirement without the need for a variance. <br /> 15 Mr. DeZelar noted the garage is also within the setback. ' <br /> 16 Commissioner Horst stated he would have a hard time recommending a variance be granted for <br /> 17 the setback. <br /> 18 Vice Chair Makowske stated this is an R-1 zone so the requirements to be met would be those of <br /> 19 an R-1 single family dwelling. He stated if there are several other churches with these identical <br /> 20 problems, perhaps the Planning Commission should revisit that issue on a larger basis (rather than <br /> 21 just an individual variance). <br /> 22 Chair Makowske noted this will be presented formally and a public hearing held on this <br /> 23 application at the September 16, 1997, meeting. <br /> 24 VIM OT +R BUSINESS. <br /> 25 1. Proposed Amendment to Sign Ordinance for Professional Buildings <br /> 26 Ms. Moore-Sykes reviewed the proposed amendment to Chapter 14, Signs, which adds a <br /> 27 definition of a Professional Building to the City's Ordinances and includes Professional Buildings <br /> 28 in the requirements for a Comprehensive Sign Plan. She advised staff submitted the proposed <br /> 29 revision to the City Attorney for his comments and he indicated that the changes are acceptable <br /> 30 and appropriate. Once the Planning Commission has reviewed this revision, the City Council will <br /> 31 hold three public readings, commencing with the August 26, 1997 City Council meeting. <br /> 32 Vice Chair Makowske stated it appears this meets what the Planning Commission was attempting ` <br /> 33 to accomplish. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.