My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02262002
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2002
>
CC PACKET 02262002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:55:39 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:55:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 02262002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.15 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: 02/12/02 MEETING DATE: 02/19/02 <br /> TO: Planning Commission Members <br /> FROM: Susan Henry, Assistant City Manager <br /> SUBJECT: Side Yard Variance Request— Ray Whitehill, 3601 Roosevelt St <br /> Requested Action: <br /> The applicant, Ray Whitehill, 3601 Roosevelt Street, is requesting a side yard variance <br /> for construction of a new single family home. Mr. Whitehill is working with Michael <br /> O'Connell of Timbercraft Homes on the construction. <br /> Background: <br /> Mr. Whitehill is asking for an 18' side yard variance to construct a new single-family <br /> home on his property located at 36 1h and Roosevelt. The proposed home measures <br /> 1257 square feet and has a 28' pad in width. To meet the side yard setback established. <br /> by city ordinance, the proposed home would need to be a 20' pad in width. According to <br /> the city ordinance, theside yard setback is 30' from the property line. The proposed <br /> home would extend into the setback area by 18'. <br /> As a note, the existing home on the property encroaches into the side yard setback by <br /> 11'. The applicant says it is not economically feasible to remodel the existing structure; <br /> in addition, the existing home has been deemed substandard. Any improvements to the <br /> existing home would require a similar variance. <br /> For hardship, the applicant states the property cannot not be put to reasonable use <br /> under the current city ordinance because the new building area would need to be 15' in <br /> width. Also, the applicant says because the lot size is 45' in width and a corner lot, a <br /> diminished building pad is created by the ordinance. A diminished building pad of 20' <br /> does not make a feasible and reasonable project. Furthermore, the applicant states the <br /> subject property was a lot of record prior to adoption of the city ordinance and it is now <br /> considered substandard. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Staff is recommending approval, given the unique facts and restrictions of the subject <br /> property. Also, this project would provide a redeveloped lot with private investment. <br /> Attachment: <br /> Petition for Variance <br /> Survey <br /> Proposed Plans/Foot Print on Lot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.