My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08151989
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1989
>
PL PACKET 08151989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:40:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1989
SP Name
PL PACKET 08171898
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> • <br /> flow. He indicated that Delta hoped to have a final <br /> remediation plan prepared for submission to the PCA by <br /> October . <br /> Commissioner Franzese asked whether any remediation was <br /> planned for any potentially contaminated water in the area. <br /> Mr. Tyson indicated that at this time the extent of the - <br /> contamination is unknown and will not be known until the <br /> monitoring wells are in place . <br /> Commissioner Franzese then asked whether META had considered <br /> finding an alternate parking area for its employees which <br /> would provide some immediate relief to the tenants . Mr. <br /> Tyson responded that, due to the employees ' irregular hours <br /> and the safety and security issues involved, META felt that <br /> employee parking should be close to the building. Alice <br /> Finley, manager of the Kenzington Condominium Association, <br /> responded that at this time all employees are parking in the <br /> overflow parking area. Mr. Tyson noted that the outside <br /> parking beside the building was reserved for visitors only. <br /> He stated that the overflow parking area would be carefully <br /> monitored to exclude unauthorized parking . <br /> • Commissioner Hansen stated that he had investigated the cost <br /> of a gravel versus a low-stress asphalt parking surface, and <br /> had discovered that asphalt might be as cheap as gravel . He <br /> noted that META has already decided to assess the association <br /> $10 per parking stall for the cost of paving the overflow <br /> parking area, and, wondered why, if META had been able to <br /> determine the amount of the assessment, they were not able to <br /> provide cost estimates of gravel versus asphalt or concrete <br /> to the Commission. He asked upon what figures the assessment <br /> had been based. Mr. Tyson indicated that he did not have <br /> that information with him. Commissioner Hansen asked that <br /> those figures be provided to the Commission, and Mr . Tyson <br /> agreed to forward whatever cost information was available to <br /> the Commission. <br /> Mr . Tyson indicated, however, that the nature of META' s <br /> hardship i-s not purely economic . He noted that the property <br /> will be the subject of future excavation and that a concrete <br /> or an asphalt parking surface is perceived to be permanent , <br /> whereas the nature of gravel is temporary. Commissioner <br /> Hansen noted that conrete and asphalt are as readily <br /> removable as gravel . <br /> Commissioner Franzese asked whether Mr. Tyson knew why there <br /> were only 12 parking spots outside the building instead of <br /> • the 15 originally planned, but Mr. Tyson was not aware of the <br /> reason for that . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.