My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05171983 (2)
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1983
>
PL PACKET 05171983 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:30:25 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1983
SP Name
PL PACKET 05171983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> Shop in the St. Anthony Village Shopping .Center because he perceives <br /> that to grant more signage for this particular business , than is <br /> permitted by ordinance for the other stores in the center, would result • <br /> in a hardship for those other merchants who would not have similar <br /> identification. <br /> Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to <br /> deny the request from Russell Underhill for a variance to the City <br /> Sign Ordinance which would permit the proprietor of-the B. J. Antique <br /> Shop at 2530 Harding Street N.E. to attach the identification sign he <br /> had .proposed to the existing non-conforming sign at the Kenzie Terrace <br /> entrance to the St. Anthony Village Shopping Center, finding, as did <br /> the Planning Commission that: <br /> (1) The new Sign Ordinance permits the identification of each tenant <br /> in the shopping center with signage on the building itself and <br /> prohibits a .general listing of tenants on the signage for the <br /> center, which might well be the precedent set for other businesses , <br /> if this request were granted. <br /> (2) None of the conditions set for granting variances to the Sign <br /> Ordinance appear to have been addressed in the application, <br /> specifically, that (a) there would appear to be no particular <br /> hardship for this business than would be experienced by other <br /> commercial businesses in the same center if the strict letter of <br /> the regulations are adhered to, and (b) the condition upon which <br /> the application was based could not be considered to be unique <br /> to this parcel and not applicable , generally , to other stores in <br /> the same center. <br /> (3) The failure of the applicant to be present for the two considera- <br /> tions of his request precluded any other recommendation, based <br /> on the information which had been submitted. <br /> (4) The manner in which the sign to which the requested signage <br /> would be attached has been maintained would seem to justify not <br /> adding to it. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> There was also Council concurrence with the Planning Commission findings <br /> for not requiring an additional variance for the change in sign copy <br /> which would be necessitated by the transfer of the Burger Chef to a <br /> Hardees franchise, especially , since the square footage for the new <br /> sign would be decreased. <br /> The remainder of the report was accepted as informational . <br /> Minutes for the May 16th meeting of the Seven County Metro Joint Pur- <br /> chasing Consortium at. Columbia Heights had been included in the Council <br /> agenda by Fire Chief Entner so the Council could see the progress <br /> which was being made in this cost-saving program. Councilman Ranallo <br /> said he recognized. the '�hard work Chief Entner had put into this venture <br /> and had been very disappointed to find the League of Minnesota Cities • <br /> seemed to be lukewarm to the concept. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.