Laserfiche WebLink
• CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> October 21, 1980 <br /> The meeting was called to .order by Chairman Bjorklund at 7 :30 P.M. <br /> Present for roll call: Peterson, Jones, Bowerman, Bjorklund, <br /> Sopcinski, Enrooth and Makowske. <br /> Also present: Ron Berg, Administrative Assistant (Jim Fornell, <br /> -City Manager:, was present intermittently part of the <br /> evening) . <br /> Motion. by Chairman Bjorklund and seconded by ,Mr.- Sopcinski to amend <br /> the September 16th Planning Commission meeting minutes to add :the <br /> following as the third paragraph of Page 6 : <br /> "Individual Planning Commission members commented upon their <br /> initial concepts of the proposal. " <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Mr. Sopcinski and seconded by Mrs. Makowske to approve as <br /> amended the-minutes-..for the -Planning Commission meeting held <br /> September 16 , 1980. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. , Peterson will represent the Commission at the next Council <br /> meeting October 28th. <br /> At 7 : 38 P.M. Chairman Bjorklund opened the public hearing for con- <br /> sideration of a Detailed Plan for the property at 3909 Silver Lake <br /> Road as part of the Development Concept Plan for the Hedlund PUD. <br /> He read the notice of the hearing which had gone out to all property <br /> owners within 350 feet of the property - (PUD) being considered.. No <br /> one present reported failure to receive such a notice nor objected <br /> to its contents. <br /> Mr. Berg outlined briefly the history of the PUD and told the 40 or <br /> more persons present the purpose of the hearing was to consider whether <br /> or- not the existing structure at 3909 Silver Lake Road could be <br /> remodeled by Craig Morris of Stacy, Minnesota for -a barber-beauty <br /> shop under the Planned Unit Development plan which has been adopted <br /> -for the Hudlund property along Silver Lake Road. He said the barber- <br /> beauty shop is permitted as a "B" Service Office use under the PUD <br /> but agreed with the City Attorney's letter of October 14th that it <br /> is up to the- discretion of the -Planning Commission whether or not <br /> they wish to recommend the Council consider this proposal singly, : <br /> as',part ,of- the staging of the PUD or only as part of the entire <br /> remaining PUD. He reported the- developer who had proposed a townhouse <br />