PL PACKET 03181984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-5- • Councilman Letourneau said he had also been involved in the develop- ment of this property for over 10 years and "still doesn' t want to set a precedent for piecemealing the site" , but "is not quite ready to take any steps which may jeopardize the PUD" . Mr. Peterson said the Planning Commission had the same concerns and the first condi- tion they had set for approval was "to maintain the integrity of the PUD, seeing under this condition,. an opportunity for retaining control even if the parcels are treated separately" . Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Sundland to approve the Detailed Plan and the Final Plan by adopting Resolution 80-0 81. RESOLUTION 80-081 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DETAILED PLAN AND FINAL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE HEDLUND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT UNDER SECTION 13 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ST. ANTHONY Voting on the resolution: Aye: Marks, Sundland, Haik and Ranallo. Nay : Letourneau. Motion carried. The meeting was recessed from 8: 55 P.M. to 9 :00 P.M. when Mr. Peter- son resumed his report on the Planning Commission actions by saying they had recommended denial of the St. Anthony Village Shopping Center, Inc. request that the property at 2550 Kenzie Terrace be, rezoned from the existing R-1 zoning to "C" its non-conforming usage for the past twenty years. Mr. Soth told Councilman Marks a moratorium on building . could only have been declared while the Comprehensive Plan was being developed and "that is' completed" . He then read the section in the City Zoning Ordinance under which he believes the existing non-conforming use of the property can be continued if an upholstery shop is permitted there agreeing with Mr. Berg ' s recommendation that this status should be retained rather than rezoning the property. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to follow the Planning Commission recommendation of denial of the request to rezone the property at 2550 Kenzie Terrace from R-1, single family residential district, to "C" , commercial district, basing the denial on their findings that: (1) The property is adjacent to residential property and the City of St. Anthony would retain greater control over any commercial usage under its existing non-conforming, but permitted use as • provided for in the City ordinance. (2) The ,Kenzie Terrace Study will probably be making recommendations for the property.