My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05151984
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1984
>
PL PACKET 05151984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:31:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:31:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1984
SP Name
PL PACKET 05151984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> i- <br /> ----- <br /> -----------REQUEST-FOR-PLANNING-COMMISSION-ACTION------------------�--- -------- --- <br /> Date Submitted Type ,of Action Requested Agenda Item Number <br /> May 1 1 , 1984 Concept Review Public Hear i ngs-c <br /> Date Action X Formal Action/Motion Title <br /> Requested Informational <br /> Other Ken H i ebe 1 Fence <br /> May 15, 1984 Variance <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------7------------- <br /> .TO: St. Anthony Planning Commission <br /> FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> S,UMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: This is a request from Ken Hiebel for a fence <br /> variance for his property at 3341 Skycroft Circle, As discussed by the Commission, <br /> objections by the neighbors should be considered and we have received no objections. <br /> Other issues seemed to be related to the proposed open rafters which would technically <br /> be defined as a porch, eave or architectural attachment to' the house. The ordinance <br /> allows projection to within three feet -of the side property line. <br /> ALTERNATIVES : Approve, modify, or deny. <br /> RECOM: ENDATION: I believe that this request has two parts . I recommend approval <br /> of the fence variance as requested, but have reservations about allowing the <br /> "ornamental" feature closer than 3 feet from the property line, both for fire pro- <br /> tection reasons as well as the precedent it could set. <br /> ATTACHMENTS : <br /> X Plan X Application Form <br /> X Mailing List Letters of Support/Objection <br /> X Notice of Hearing <br /> CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW: COt1MENTS : <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.