Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 b. there was no one present during the hearing who spoke in opposition to the <br /> 2 variance and staff reported receiving no calls for or against the request <br /> 3 prior to the hearing, <br /> 4 <br /> 5 c. the alleyway between this property and St. Anthony Boulevard is not a <br /> 6 thoroughway and, therefore, a 30 foot setback in this instance might be <br /> 7 excessive; and <br /> 8 <br /> g d. extending the breezeway would bring it into alignment with the existing <br /> 10 garage. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 14 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITY FOR DAIRY QUEEN <br /> 16 The Chair opened the hearing at 7:54 P.M. <br /> 17 <br /> : l g Notice of the hearing had been published in the October 8th Bulletin and mailed <br /> 19 to all property owners of record within 350 feet of the subject property. No <br /> 20 one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its content. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Request: conditional use permit in a commercial zone to include a drive-through <br /> 23 window as part of an expansion and remodeling project in the St. <br /> 24 Anthony Shopping Center. <br /> 25) <br /> 26 Proponents: Albert Plaisted, 5210 O'Connell Drive, Moundsview, owner <br /> • 27 Charles Anderson, 2827 Helen Street, Maplewood, contractor <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Opponents: none. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Staff input:, indicated no change from current traffic flow planned; <br /> 32 raised no objections to request; <br /> 33 <br /> 34 showed colored sketch of plans the St. Anthony Shopping Center <br /> 35 owners have indicated they intend to implement by March, 1987 <br /> 36 on which the applicant has indicated he intended to model his <br /> 37 existing structure; <br /> 38 suggested curbings rather than lines might better distinguish <br /> 39 the traffic direction for its drive-through customers. He said <br /> 40 the existing traffic arrow in the same area had only been intended <br /> 41 management to indicate slant parking. <br /> by the shopping center manag p 9 <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Proponents' Response to Commission Questions <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Traffic flow: west to east past window with ample room for two vehicles <br /> 46 to pass if driver attempted to follow existing patterns. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Eberhardt wants traffic flow to remain as is with no curbings <br /> 49 because of snow storage; <br /> 50 from one to three existing parking stalls to be removed; <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Center anticipates no need to use parking near Dairy Queen <br /> 5 3 because parking forecasts have been revised. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 Building to match proposed center store front renovation: bronze <br /> 56 design: mansard roof with light blue brick facia, signage on mansard <br /> 57 to match center plans: <br />