My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02161988
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1988
>
PL PACKET 02161988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:36:55 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:36:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1988
SP Name
PL PACKET 02161988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1 -8- <br /> 2 2 . that no vegetation higher than 3-1/2 feet be planted along <br /> . 3 37th Avenue from Roosevelt Street to the eastern edge of the <br /> 4 house; and <br /> 5 3 . that no curb cut off on 37th Avenue be allowed. <br /> 6 In recommending these variances be granted, the Planning Commission <br /> 7 finds that: <br /> 8 *other uses of the lot seem to be limited; <br /> 9 *the extent of the variance request presented at this time dif- <br /> 10 fers greatly from the variances which were denied in 1979 for a <br /> 11 duplex; <br /> 12 *all three conditions required by statute to be satisfied affirma- <br /> 13 tively before these variances can be granted have been met and <br /> 14 satisfactorily addressed by the applicant in his petition. <br /> 15 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 16 MISCELLANEOUS <br /> AJ7 Dairy Queen Owner Explains SicTnage <br /> 18 In his July 17th memorandum to the Commission related to the signage on <br /> 19 the above, Mr. Childs reiterated the differences in perceptions which <br /> 20 had arisen since the Dairy Queen had been remodeled with two identifying <br /> 21 signs in the mansard and retention of the revolving roof sign, which had <br /> 22 been "grandfathered in" with the 1973 City Ordinance. As indicated in <br /> 23 the minutes of the October 21, 1986 Planning Commission hearing on <br /> 24 proposed signage for the establishment, the City Manager reiterated <br /> 25 that he had not been in attendance, but rather the Public Works <br /> 26 Department Director had given the staff report on the signage request. <br /> 27 The Manager said what he had perceived from hearing all sides of the <br /> 28 question was that members of the Planning Commission, the Dairy Queen <br /> 29 owner, Al Plaisted, and Mr. Hamer was that "evidently not everybody <br /> 30 functioned on the same wave length related to understanding that <br /> 31 meeting" because the Commissioners believe they were firm abou+- only two <br /> 32 signs being erected and Mr. Plaisted thought he was allowed three and <br /> 33 went ahead and put up all three when the facility was remodeled to match <br /> 34 the new design adopted for all Dairy Queen stores. A copy of the June <br /> 35 28 , 1987 , letter to Mr. Plaisted from Charles Anderson of the Blue Line <br /> 36 Construction Company, contractors for the project had been included in <br /> 37 the agenda packet and set forth the contractor' s understanding of the <br /> 38 events which led to the erection of three signs on the store. The <br /> 39 Commissioners had also been provided with copies of the pertinent <br /> �0 minutes of the October 21st meeting in their agenda packets. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.