Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> ° n conforming structure is destroyed thlLn <br /> Franzese if 70/ of no g Y <br /> • you have lost the ability 'to use that non-conforming use . <br /> but whereas you are not intending to alter the sign . . <br /> b y g <br /> Werenicz also maintaing the D Q logo in the new mansard, also <br /> h...e in addition to leaving the existing rotating sign up? <br /> Plaisted yes . needs that at least for better sight from the highwa <br /> VL Ct1el <br /> from the north. Can see Dairy Queen a block past the <br /> stop signs <br /> We 're not moving the building just adding on to the <br /> front that stays exactly where it is as far as it ' s at . <br /> so sign would be put back on the building - new building- <br /> exactly where it is now. It shouldr,.-Tmake a difference <br /> with how you' re going to treat the other people in the <br /> • center because it ' s something that ' s already there. <br /> Not changing it or its size. <br /> Hansen can see n �son why the existing sign would have to <br /> go but I did hear something about an additional wall <br /> sign which in itself would require a variance . <br /> Franzese the type of sign is non conforming Your busines! <br /> requires a sign. But as far as how much signage <br /> you can get or how many signs that is governed by <br /> i <br /> ordinance. So) if you intend keeping the sign you have <br /> and in addition having another sign there would need <br /> to be a variance for that other sign . <br /> Hansen only published for a free standing sign <br /> Hamer Ordinance goes this way Every commercial business <br /> • shall be allowed one identifying sign per business . <br /> So if you had another sign down below that would <br /> constitute two signs . <br />