Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> January 10, 1995 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 Motion by Enrooth, second by Marks to approve Resolution 95-018, modifying the 1994 Budget <br /> 2 by a transfer of funds from Public Works, Maintenance and Repair, General Supplies, to City <br /> 3 Buildings, Maintenance and Repair, in the amount of$15,646.00 for payment to Industrial Door <br /> 4 Company for the installation of 5 doors in the Public Works Building. <br /> 5 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 6 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS. <br /> 7 A. 1995 Street Improvements Project(Resolution 95-012, re: Ordering Improvements <br /> 8 B. Assessments for 1995 Street Improvements (Resolution 95-013. re: Adopting and <br /> 9 Confirming 1995 Assessments ) <br /> 10 At 7:10 P.M. Mayor Ranallo opened the public hearing for a resolution ordering improvements <br /> 11 and adopting and confirming 1995 assessments for Crestview Drive, from 29th Avenue N.E. to <br /> 12 31 st Avenue N.E.; Armour Terrace, from Silver Lake Road to Crestview Drive; Bell Lane, <br /> 13 from Armour Terrace to Crestview Drive; and East Gate Road, from Crestview Drive to Rankin <br /> 14 Road. <br /> 15 Mark Anderson, Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, explained that his firm was hired by the City <br /> of St. Anthony to prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the project, provide <br /> construction survey inspections, and general engineering services during construction. He <br /> 18 reported that in the Fall of 1994, City Council authorized RCM Associates, to perform the <br /> 19 feasibility report for the project. The project will include reconstruction of city streets east of <br /> 20 Silver Lake Road between 29th and 31 st Avenues. The feasibility report wassubmitted to City <br /> 21 Council for review and they authorized plans and specifications to be prepared by RCM. In <br /> 22 December of 1994, RCM secured bids for the project. They received a number of bids and the <br /> 23 lowest bid received was from the same construction company who performed last year's street <br /> 24 improvements, which went very well. Anderson stated that once the bids are received, his <br /> 25 company becomes aware of what the final cost of the construction will be and at that time <br /> 26 calculates the assessments to the benefitted properties on the involved streets. The city then sent <br /> 27 notice of the assessments to the owners of the properties.' There were neighborhood meetings <br /> 28 held to.provide greater detail of the project. He reported that the project is scheduled to begin in <br /> 29 May of 1995 and will be completed the end of August 1995. He advised that there will be a <br /> 30 person on the street,throughout the project, who will serve as a resident contact. The residents <br /> 31 will be able to contact him.in person, or by pager or phone. Hewill work with the residents to be <br /> 32 sure their needs are being met. Mr. Anderson reported that residents will have access to their <br /> 33 property every evening and they will be notified if the access will be closed for a period of time. <br /> 34 Mr. Anderson then explained the procedure used for determining assessment costs to the <br /> 35 property. He stated the assessment is set up primarily by the city to convey part of the cost of <br /> the project to the benefiting owners. The benefiting owners are charged 35%of the costs based <br /> on the amount of front footage of the property. The city pays for the other 65%. In addition to <br /> 38 the assessment, there is a connection fee for the water main of$400.00 per lot, based on the cost <br />