Laserfiche WebLink
- �1(`=_:111- =O�W�=a..r•- -,-� s—�.�� --r� <br /> the new law, Minnesota cities now have the city s the a licaithin 10 <br /> More thoughts y pp <br /> 60 days to make three kinds of deci- business days after receiving the�j��� <br /> on the new 60- sions:zoning,septic system and MUSA application,and only if the rejec�i0 is <br /> line decisions. (The MUSA line is the based on the applicant's failure-ttf <br /> day limit metropolitan urban service area comply with pre-existing city require- <br /> boundary in the seven-county metro- ments.An applicant may waive <br /> politan area. Property within this area time limits. <br /> KAREN COLE is served by metropolitan sewage To comply with the new stat te, ities <br /> treatment facilities.)Cities may extend must not only take action within the <br /> the 60-day period for an additional 60 time limit,they must also noto the <br /> A quick review of the days if they give written notice of the applicant within the time limit.If a city <br /> basics extension and the reason for it before denies an application, it must give <br /> By now,most cities are aware that a the initial 60-day period expires. If the written reasons for its decision"at the <br /> new state statute adopted last year- proposer's application is incomplete, time it denies the request."It is likely <br /> Minn.Stat. § 15.99-sets a time limit the city may reject the application and sufficient if the city provides formal <br /> for certain land use decisions. Under restart the 60-day time clock but only if written notice after the meeting at <br /> Fwe questions c�t�es should consider. s <br /> fy Cities should ask themselves a the Lea ue research staff or from the' information needs.A written a- lica <br /> g Y ._� F .,_ ,a �r -PP - <br /> number of key-questions to make author:: = tion form or checklist that represents ;! <br /> Y sure they can comply with Minn Stat'. 2. How broadly will:the'city city policy is sufficient. o. <br /> § 15.99: Anterpret ahe`scope of the law? '.The city may wish to be expansive <br /> 1. Should the city modify its , -;The scope of.Minn.Stet.§`15.99 is in defining its information require <br /> -procedures? not completely clear:While.it is clear --ments..lt is always possible for the <br /> Cities should evaluate their -L.that the law applies to:certain -. city to waive a requirement not <br /> procedures so they will compty'with -•---applications such as rezonings, needed for a particular project.The <br /> the new time limits. It maybe helpful :.variances;and conditional use city may not, however, restart the <br /> to map out a typical timeline'for-the.:: permits,there is room for some time clock by imposing new require- <br /> processing of an application so that '.. disagreement when it comes to some ments that may be appropriate for a <br /> processing of the application fits=: other approvals like preliminary plat particular application but which were <br /> within the new deadlines. Modifica and comprehensive plan approvals.A not"previously adopted." <br /> tions may be necessary For example,.._.city that'wants to be conservative -In defining information require �. <br /> a city that presently'requires two or ;-should interpret the'law expansively- . ments,the city should review applica <br /> three hearings for rezonings may .. . ..,to apply to all of these approvals tions that have been received over, <br /> want to,consider eliminating one of untiLthe Legislature or the courts _'perhaps,the last five years.Were <br /> � . <br /> the hearings. .:~ r �::" address these:ainbiguities. `� there instances where additional <br /> Requiring'a preapplication meet 3.'What�nforrnation will be `information was needed or requested <br /> ing with staff as a`requirement for a required for each kind of affected . by the city?The city may also wish to- <br /> •complete application is another application?_ take into account the impact of ' <br /> procedural change cities may want to :..Cities may restart the time'clock project location, scale and design on <br /> _.consider.Such a meeting gives cities 10 business days of a,written : information needs. For example, it <br /> the opportunity to that T ` request if an application:does not `may be appropriate to require more <br /> applications:are complete, and.to ::contain "ail information required by or different information for applica <br /> waive'appIication requirements that. ..law or by a previously adopted rule, tions in particular parts of the city <br /> may not be necessary for a particular ordinance or,policy." (Emphasis that involve wetlands, lakeshore or <br /> _proposal added.)The`city may always request more densely developed areas., <br /> be'::- <br /> 'In addition,cities should also p.ut additional information-from the Similarly,.more in <br /> may be <br /> procedures in for monitoring applicant once the 10-day period has needed for larger projects :r <br /> the deadlines,so that deadlines are - passed if;for example,:new issues :.The'citymay wish to require a'pre µ <br /> not missed inadvertently:A log arise. Once the 10-day period passes; : application meeting with the city's <br /> =3 should be prepared that flags the key :however,the city may not restart the_ . _ staff as a prerequisite for a complete <br /> _ deadlines for:each application,= ' ' _ statutory time clock:Cities should, application.This will enable the city '....., <br /> including the 10-day deadline:for=':' therefore,carefully specify in writing to work with the applicant to ensure_,•,:- <br /> specifying additional information and: all information required for each that all needed information is <br /> n.. <br /> the deadline. or approval or. .',;.:;'kind of application.The city need not- submitted.This pre-application`:.:::_.:,: <br /> denial.A sample Jog is available from enact an"ordinance specifying its meeting also gives the city the <br />