Laserfiche WebLink
FPlanning Commission Special Meeting Minutes <br /> January 30, 1996 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 10 foot side yard <br /> 2 variance request made by Ste. Marie Corporation. If the variance is granted, it will not alter the <br /> 3 essential character of the property or locality. The variance request was made for the purpose of. <br /> 4 enhancing the redevelopment of the property- to return it to its reasonable and best use. <br /> 5 Because the Ste. Marie Corporation acquired this property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure, <br /> 6 they did not create the hardship that has caused them to request the side yard variance. <br /> 7 Chair Bergstrom asked for any questions of staff. No questions were raised. Mr. Scott gave an <br /> 8 overview of the area for the variance, and stated they were prepared to meet all guidelines of <br /> 9 reconstruction of wall and to move forward for Phase I. <br /> 10 Commissioner Gondorchin asked if the zero lot line is approved, what the exterior of the mall will <br /> 11 resemble. Mr. Scott responded that plans were not finalized, but it would be comparable to the <br /> 12 current Apache Plaza, and would look complete. <br /> 13 Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. after no further questions were raised. <br /> 14 Motion by Gondorchin, seconded by Franzese,to approve 10 foot sideyard/zero lot line request for <br /> 15 the property known as Apache Plaza, Lot 7, based on the following rationale: <br /> 16 1. Strict enforcement of existing codes would cause undue hardship preventing the <br /> 17 redevelopment of a deteriorating and obsolete structure. <br /> 18 2. Ste.Marie Corporation acquired the property through the deed in lieu of foreclosure, <br /> 19 and the mall must remain intact and operational to honor leases of existing tenants. <br /> 20 The circumstances are unique and not created by the individual. <br /> 21 3. Granting of the variance will not alter the character of the area and makes sound <br /> 22 economic sense for the City of St. Anthony. <br /> 23 4. The wall to be constructed on the lot line, endorsed by Building Official Duane C. <br /> 24 Grace,will be constructed conforming to the Uniform Building Code, Section 504.6. <br /> 25 See letter dated December 27, 1995 addressed to Larry Hamer representing the City <br /> 26 of St. Anthony and Jack Amdal, Vice President of KKE Architects. <br /> 27 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 28 <br /> -29 V. OTHER ITEMS. <br /> 30 A. Review Comprehensive Sign Plan <br /> 31 Ms. Moore-Sykes read the staff report: <br />