Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> November 18, 1997 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1 motorists. Mr. Sarna is proposing to place a lit double-sided monument sign at each curb cut. <br /> 2 There are two curb cuts on the property. These signs would exceed the 68 square foot <br /> 3 maximum for a double-sided ground sign. Each proposed monument sign is 6 feet by 8 feet <br /> 4 and which results in a total of 96 square feet of signage. If two monument signs would not <br /> 5 be acceptable, Mr. Sarna is requesting one lit double-sided monument sign at the curb cut and <br /> 6 a lit twin post canopy island sign. Mr. Sarna is also proposing wall signs similar to what <br /> 7 exists now. <br /> 8 Chair Bergstrom asked if the total coverage of the wall signage had been calculated. <br /> 9 Ms. Moore-Sykes stated it had not. <br /> 10 Jim Sarna, owner of property at 2400-37th Avenue NE, stated he is proposing to remove the <br /> 11 pylon sign on this property and locate a ground sign facing 37th Avenue NE and a ground <br /> 12 sign facing Stinson Boulevard. Each sign will be 6 feet by 8 feet. <br /> 13 Commissioner Franzese applauded Mr. Sarna for removing the pylon sign. She acknowledged <br /> 14 the dilemma of this site and,stated she preferred the second sign plan which included one <br /> 15 monument sign and a lit twin post canopy island sign. <br /> 16 Mr. Sarna stated he preferred the first option which included two monument signs as <br /> 17 customers would be able to see the prices from both directions. He stated the plan would <br /> 18 include enhancing the corner on which the signs are located with shrubbery, etc. <br /> 19 Chair Bergstrom noted the City's intent is to not have signs located on canopies. <br /> 20 Mr. Sarna's son asked if canopies are allowed to be lit. <br /> 21 Chair Bergstrom stated this was acceptable. <br /> 22 Commissioner Makowske asked that at the time of request for approval of the sign plan, Mr. <br /> 23 Sarna include a landscape plan for the site. <br /> 24 Commissioner Franzese asked why the monuments signs were so large. <br /> 25 Mr. Sarna stated this is the size of a typical sign. The proposed sign is small in relation to <br /> 26 the size of the lot and is a typical sign for this type of corner which is surrounded by <br /> 27 businesses and open ground. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Commissioner Franzese asked what rationale could be given for the size of the signs. <br /> 30 Mr. Sama stated the rationale was that he was removing the pylon sign which was <br /> 31 approximately 150 feet and replacing it with two signs, which are more than 100 feet apart, <br /> 32 and a total of 96 square feet. <br />