Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> May 18, 1999 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Staff has advised their that they also need to be aware of the setbacks and lot coverage <br /> 2 restrictions for this zoning district. As their letter indicates, they are aware of the need to address <br /> 3 those issues without requesting additional variances. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 The lot in question is 60 feet wide and its area is 7,985 square feet and as such, not considered a <br /> 6 buildable residential lot according to City Ordinance. The Ordinance states that a residential lot <br /> 7 in the R-1 Zoning District must be at minimum 75 feet wide and an interior lot must be not less <br /> 8 than 9,000 square feet. The Sperrys are asking for a lot width variance of 15 feet and a lot area <br /> 9 variance of 1,015 square feet. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 In granting the variance, the essential character of the neighborhood would not be altered and <br /> 12 would be in keeping with the intention and spirit of the Zoning Code. It is also possible that this <br /> 13 lot can not be put to reasonable use without these variances. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Mr. and Mrs. Sperry contend that there is a hardship in that the owner did not create this situation <br /> 16 and that the Council had approved this lot split in September 1985. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Horst asked whether the Ordinance regarding minimum lot size was written prior to 1985 when <br /> 19 the Johnson's original lot split was approved. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated the Ordinance was <br /> 20 written in 1978 when many 60-foot wide lots existed and the City wanted to set new tone for <br /> 21 available vacant property. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Stille asked how old the community was, and when the plat was originally filed. The Johnson's <br /> 24 confirmed their house was built in'1963 and was one of the first on the block. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Melsha noted a question had been raised with regard to storm water issues in that neighborhood <br /> 27 and a building moratorium which had been imposed. Ms. Moore-Sykes stated that moratorium <br /> 28 was no longer in effect. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Bergstrom invited the Johnson's and Sperry's to address the Council. Mr. Sperry presented <br /> 31 plans for his proposed home, adding the home fits in with the style of homes in the neighborhood <br /> 32 and falls within the 35% lot coverage. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Tillman noted a petition signed by neighbors in support of the request, and asked whether all <br /> 35 surrounding neighbors were included on the petition. The Johnson's confirmed that all the <br /> 36 surrounding neighbors have signed the petition. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Bob Graham, 4020 Fordham Drive, expressed concern over flooding issues in the neighborhood <br /> 39 which the City has done nothing to rectify after promising to address them before any <br /> 40 construction could commence. He requested that the City understand that continued deviation <br />