Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO <br /> • DATE: 1/10/01 MEETING DATE: 1/16/01 <br /> TO: Planning Commissioners <br /> FROM: Susan Henry, Assistant City Manager <br /> RE: Walgreens Sign Variance Request <br /> Requested Action: <br /> On January 9, 2001, the City Council looked at the resolutions passed onto them by the Planning <br /> Commission from public hearings held on the Walgreens development on December 19, 2000. All <br /> of the resolutions passed,with the exception of the sign variance request. <br /> Background: <br /> At the January 9, 2001, City Council meeting, TOLD Development announced that it would take <br /> the electronic component out of the sign variance request. At this point, the petitioner is requesting <br /> a sign variance to allow for a ground (or monument sign) consisting of 50 square feet of copy on <br /> each side, for a total surface copy area of 100 square feet. City code states the allowable sign copy <br /> surface area is a maximum of 68 square feet. The request exceeds the existing code by 32 square <br /> feet, 16 square feet per side. <br /> At the December 19, 2000, Planning Commission public hearing, there.was a'3-3 (tie),vote on the <br /> motion to approve the sign surface copy area, taking out the electronic sign. The City Council would <br /> like the Planning Commission to reconsider the request to determine if hardship can be defined for <br /> ..granting the sign variance for the copy surface area. Findings could be, by not limited to, the <br /> following: (1) the property elevations makes it difficult to view the signage; (2) the easements make <br /> sign placement difficult; and (3) the property is difficult to develop. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Staff is looking for the Planning Commission to reconsider the Walgreens sign variance request, <br /> after looking more closely at the hardship issue in relation to the City's sign ordinance. <br /> Attachment: <br /> • Monument Sign Plans <br />