Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> December 19, 2000 <br /> • Page 2 <br /> 1 Bergstrom reviewed this issue for the Planning Commission by stating that Accurate Wire Solutions <br /> 2 has submitted a formal petition to the City of St. Anthony for a street vacation for Anthony Lane. <br /> 3 Henry explained that with an addition planned by Accurate.Wire Solutions,more parking is needed <br /> 4 and necessary(per City Code)for the petitioner. It was noted that Staff finds it is conducive for the <br /> 5 City to grant this request to retain this business and assist with making the necessary <br /> 6 accommodations. Thus, staff recommends approval of the street vacation per the City Engineer's <br /> 7 comments as contained in his written report. <br /> 8 Roger Stoick,President of Accurate Wire Solutions,introduced himself and explained the proposed <br /> 9 addition measures 7,000 square feet and to accommodate this,Accurate Wire Solutions is requesting <br /> 10 the street vacation from the City. The City Code states required parking is 200 square feet per car. <br /> 11 Accurate Wire Solutions plans to add 20 cars to its parking lot so they would be required to have <br /> 12 4,000 square feet for parking. He presented a site plan of their existing building and proposed <br /> 13 addition, noting it far exceeds Code requirements since they will have 27,000 square feet available <br /> 14 for cars. <br /> 15 Thomas asked how many total employees they project in two.years. Mr.Stoick stated they currently <br /> 16 have 20 employees and the capacity of their organization is for 25 employees. Much of the space <br /> 17 is to store larger.products they sell along with taller ceilings to accommodate more storage.. He <br /> 18 stated he is unaware of any employees that ride the bus or bicycle to work. <br /> 19 Bergstrom noted the allowable square footages and parking requirements. He stated if this request <br /> 20 is within those requirements for setbacks and lot coverages,only a building permit is needed. Mr. <br /> 21 Stoick stated he believes the request is within the requirements and stated he has not yet selected a <br /> 22 builder and will meet with staff with regard to ordinance requirements. <br /> 23 Hatch arrived at 7:11 p.m. <br /> 24 Stille inquired regarding the location of the property to be vacated. Mr.Stoick identified the location <br /> 25 on the site plan. <br /> 26 Melsha noted the letter from WSB regarding their review of this request. Mr. Stoick stated he has <br /> 27 no objection to the suggestions and has already submitted the fee to the City. <br /> 28 There being no further questions, Chair Bergstrom closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. <br /> 29 Chair Bergstrom noted the City would be giving up this property and asked if this is a reasonable <br /> 30 consideration. He stated his view that it would allow an existing business to expand and the property <br /> 31 currently serves little public purpose. <br /> 32 Melsha stated his agreement, noting a pond is located on the other side. <br /> 33 Chair Bergstrom noted the City of Roseville was contacted and indicated it is no longer in their plan <br /> 34 to construct the small stub. <br />