My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 02202001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 02202001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:40:09 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:40:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 02202001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 11 <br /> 1 Mr. Shardlow stated he anticipates they will meet with Hennepin County Parks. Mayor <br /> 2 Cavanaugh encouraged them to meet prior to the February meeting.. <br /> 3 IX. GENERAL POLICY BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL (continued). <br /> 4 F. Resolution 01-030, re: Sale of Tax Abatement Bonds for Central Park Improvements <br /> 5 (Springsted, Inc.) <br /> 6 This item was considered earlier in the meeting. <br /> 7 G. Resolution 01-029, re: Approval of Phase II Investigation relating to the redevelopment <br /> 8 of Central Park. <br /> 9 Mr. Hubmer explained this action is a proposal from BRW URS, Inc. to complete the Phase II <br /> 10 investigation related to the redevelopment of Central.Park. He stated there are two options on <br /> 11 how to deal with the materials found. One is to remove the materials from site and the other is to <br /> 12 leave them on site with a cap. The Phase II investigation will determine the limits of the dump, <br /> 13 contents of the dump, and include laboratory analysis to determine the acceptable method for <br /> 14 handling the material. Mr. Hubmer stated removal of the material is an expensive option. <br /> 15 Mr. Hubmer stated they would like to coordinate this effort with the Harding Street project that <br /> 16 will have additional soils which could be used in the cap. He explained the PCA would decide <br /> 17 the acceptable material that can be used in the cap and once determined, they will haul that <br /> 18 material from the Harding Street project to Central Park. If the cap material needs to be <br /> 19 purchased and hauled in, it will result in a significant expense. <br /> 20 Mr. Hubmer explained this would be a change to the Harding Street project since the contractor <br /> 21 had intended to use that material within the Harding Street project. He stated there is a 90-day <br /> 22 hold to award the contract to March 13th which allows the investigative work to proceed and <br /> 23 identify the quantity of materials needed from the Harding Street Project. Once determined, the <br /> 24 Harding Street project contract can be amended. He stated he believes the Harding Street project <br /> 25 contains adequate materials for use in both projects. <br /> 26. Thuesen asked if the ground water situation impacts the ability to place and cap the materials. <br /> 27 Mr. Hubmer stated that will be researched and taken into consideration. He stated the PCA can <br /> 28 require the City to conduct additional laboratory analysis that could incur additional costs. <br /> 29 Thuesen noted the estimate of$52,500 and that the potential exists for a large cost over run. He <br /> 30 suggested that proactive discussions occur about how this funding can be accommodated. <br /> 31 Sparks asked if the favorable bond market gives the City some additional funding. City Attorney <br /> 32 Jerome Gilligan stated there will be more abatement dollars but that would be received each year, <br /> 33 not all in the first year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.